复合思维:家事纠纷解决中公益律师的行动逻辑——基于对中部D县的考察

Compound thinking:the action logic of public interest lawyers in family dispute resolution:Based on the investigation of D County in central China

与传统家事纠纷解决的实践逻辑相比,公益律师在解决当下家事纠纷中遵循着复合思维,“基于形式主义,辅以实用道德主义”的复合思维成为其行动准则。基于此,透过法律社会学的视角,从公益律师的行动切入,描述三宗发生在中部D县的典型案例,呈现公益律师在家事纠纷解决中所采取的“法律专家权威”“家长式权威”与“诉讼代理人权威”三种应对策略。随后分析公益律师采取这三种行动逻辑的成因。一是公益律师试图消除柔性权力空间与结构性因素之间的悖论;二是公益律师有必要在法律知识与道德规范之间找到平衡点;三是公益律师需要缓解社会律师与公益律师之间的角色紧张。接下来,讨论与反思公益律师采取复合思维的适用限度问题。最后,公益律师在法治社会建设进程中的功能再检视成为本文之后应持续关注的扩展研究。

Compared with the practical solutions to traditional family disputes,public interest lawyers(PILs)follow compound thinking on solving current family disputes.The formalism interacted with practical moralism has become the code of this thinking.Based on this,from the perspective of the legal sociology and the action of PILs,this paper describes three typical cases in D County in central China,presenting the three strategies that PILs adopt in dealing with family disputes:legal expert authority,patriarchal authority and litigation agent authority.Then this paper analyzes the reasons why PILs take these three kinds of action.First,those lawyers try to eliminate the paradox between flexible power space and structural factors.Second,it is necessary for PILs to find a balance between legal knowledge and moral norms.Third,PILs need to ease the tension between social lawyers and PILs.Next,this paper discusses and reflects on the applicable limit of PILs to adopt compound thinking.Finally,the review of the function of PILs in the process of building a law-based society becomes an extended study that should be paid continuous attention to in the future.