期刊文献+

论《中欧全面投资协定》的规则特点与中国应对

On the Features of CAI and China’s Countermeasures Against Its Effects
原文传递
导出
摘要 CAI是国际经济深入发展的产物,是中欧双方共同意志的最大化成果,为国际经贸规则的转变指引方向。CAI对既往BITs进行较大程度的改造,表现在细化既往BITs中的规定,同时还引申其他国际文件作为东道国义务的来源。作为一类双边投资协定,CAI从规范东道国的管理行为出发,以促进投资自由化、规则明细化、建立含有“以人为本”理念的条款、调整贸易与投资活动和连结各双边经贸协定为特点。同时它以经济合作带动中欧双方在其他非经济领域开展合作,扩大双方的合作面和提高双方的合作深度,为中欧双方的经济合作描绘蓝图。虽然CAI的生效受到多方面的影响而遇阻,但是中国不会因此停下经济改革的步伐。 The China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment(CAI)is the sign of further development of the international economy,presents the common will between China and EU,and indicates the way to reform international economic rules.CAI reforms the previous BITs to a large extent.It refines the provisions in the previous BITs,and it also applies other international documents as the source of obligations to the host states.As a kind of bilateral investment agreements,basing on regulating the administrative conducts of the host states,is ameliorated its rules to promote investment liberalization through detailing rules,establishing the clauses on“Human-Centred”approach,coordinating the relationship between trade and investment activities and connecting all bilateral economic agreements between China and EU.Different from previous BITs,CAI stipulates more terms to regulate non-economic fields which seem to be indirectly tangential with economic activities as well,so that it expands and deepens economic cooperation between China and EU,and draws a blueprint for economic cooperation between them.Although the date when CAI enters into force is uncertain because of various parameters,China will not abandon the cause to reform its economy.
作者 张宇斌 Zhang Yubin
出处 《贸大法律评论》 2022年第1期14-25,共12页 Uibe Legal Science
关键词 中欧全面投资协定 双边投资协定 以人为本 The China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment(CAI) Bilateral Investment Treaties(BITs) Human-Centred
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献95

  • 1叶斌(译),胡建国(译),娄思彤(译).2019年3月19日欧洲议会和理事会对进入联盟的外国直接投资建立审查框架的第2019/452号欧盟条例[J].欧洲法律评论,2019(1):205-223. 被引量:25
  • 2徐崇利.“体系外国家”心态与中国国际法理论的贫困[J].政法论坛,2006,24(5):33-36. 被引量:33
  • 3Jane Perlez, China and Japan, in Sign of a Thaw, Agree to Disagree on a Disputed Island Group ,The New York Times, Nov. 7, 2014.
  • 4Ryan Scoville, Japan: No Dispute Over the Senkaku/Diaoyu, The Diplomat, December 24, 2014.
  • 5Walter Isaacson, Kissinger: A Bibliography, Simon & Schuster, 1992,pp. 481-482.
  • 6Oliver E. Williamson, The Economics Institutions of Capitalism.- Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, 1985, New York: Free Press.
  • 7Itay Fischhendler, Legal and Institutional Adaptation to Climate Uncertainty: A Study of International Rivers, Water Policy 6, 2004,pp. 281-302.
  • 8Itay Fischhendler, When Ambiguity in Treaty Design Becomes Destructive: A Study of Transboundary Water, Global Environ- mental Politics, Volume 8, Number 1, 2008, pp. 111-112.
  • 9Nuno Pires de Carvalho, The TRIPS Regime of Patent Rights, Kluwer Law International,2010,pp. 75-76.
  • 10Peter K. Yu, The International Enclosure Movement, Indiana Law Journal, VoI. 82, Issue. 4, Fall 2007, p. 864.

共引文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部