摘要
标准必要专利是指为实施某一标准而必须使用的专利,因其同时具备私权属性与公共属性,故基于利益平衡与公共利益对标准必要专利禁令救济进行一定的限制具有合理性。近年来涉及标准必要专利的诉讼案件不断增多,关于禁令救济的限制也引起了实务界与理论界的关注,我国立法与司法实践也对此进行了积极探索,但仍存在诸多不完善的地方。在专利法的视域内,对标准必要专利禁令救济的限制方式主要是基于专利默示许可制度与FRAND承诺。本文通过梳理我国相关的规范性文件,分析其在适用中存在的问题,并提出进一步完善的建议。
The standards-essential patents have both the private property and the public property,so it is reasonable to limit the relief of the standards-essential patents injunction based on the balance of interests and the public interest.In recent years,litigation cases involving standards-essential patents on increasing,injunctive relief restrictions also caused the attention of practical and theoretical circles,China’s legislative and judicial practice has also made active explorations,but there are still many imperfections.In the view of patent law,the restrictions on the relief of the standards-essential patents injunction are mainly implied in patent licensing system and FRAND commitment.By combing relevant normative documents in China,this paper analyzes the problems existing in its application and puts forward suggestions for further improvement.
出处
《贸大法律评论》
2018年第1期39-51,共13页
Uibe Legal Science
关键词
标准必要专利
禁令救济
默示许可
FRAND原则
专利法
standard essential patents
injunctive relief
implied license
FRAND principle
patent law