期刊文献+

“霸座”行为何时休?——基于违约失信监管的博弈分析

When Will Act of “Occupying Seats” Stop?——Based on the Game Analysis of Supervision of Default and Credit Loss
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "霸座"等违约失信现象频频发生引发了严重的社会信用危机,也给监管当局提出了具体要求。基于对违约失信监管的静态博弈模型和动态博弈模型研究分析显示:监管当局加大对违约失信行为的处罚力度,增加违约失信行为的成本,能有效降低违约失信行为的发生概率。继而,有针对性地提出违约失信监管的对策及建议,丰富、扩展了信用监管和失信惩戒的相关研究。 The frequent occurrence of acts of default and dishonesty,such as"occupying seats",triggered a serious social credit crisis and also brought specific requirements for the regulatory authorities.Based on the analysis of the static game model and the dynamic game model,the regulatory authorities’taking measures of stepping up in the punishment,increasing the cost of default and credit loss can effectively reduce the probability of its occurrence.Then,the countermeasures and suggestions for the supervision of default and dishonesty were put forward in a pointed manner,the related research on credit supervision and the punishment of dishonest acts was enriched and expanded.
作者 黄佳卉 王忠兴 舒长江 HUANG Jia-hui;WANG Zhong-xing;SHU Chang-jiang(School of Economics and Management,Nanchang Hangkong University,Nanchang 330063,China;Beijing Daxing Jiuyin County Bank,Beijing 100032,China)
出处 《南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第4期36-42,共7页 Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University(Social Sciences)
基金 2018年“十三五”全国教育科学规划课题“航空类高校航空科技智库建设路径研究:理论与实证”(FIB180528) 2019年江西省研究生创新专项基金“航空科技智库建设路径研究一基于我国航空类高校的分析”(YC2019-S349).
关键词 失信惩戒机制 政府监管 博弈分析 “霸座”行为 disciplinary mechanism against dishonesty government regulation game analysis act of"occupying seats"
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部