期刊文献+

酰胺质子转移磁共振成像对低级别和高级别胶质瘤鉴别诊断价值的Meta分析 被引量:3

A meta-Analysis of Amide Proton Transfer Weighted MRI for the Differential Diagnosis of Low and High Grade Gliomas
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用Meta分析评价酰胺质子转移(APT)MRI对低级别和高级别胶质瘤的鉴别诊断价值。方法全面检索PubMed、Ovid、EBSCO、EMbase、CNKI、万方数据库、CBM和维普数据库,纳入鉴别低级别和高级别胶质瘤的APT-MRI文献。采用Stata 13.0软件计算合并敏感度、特异度、诊断比值比(DOR)、阳性似然比(LR+)、阴性似然比(LR-),并绘制汇总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)和计算曲线下面积(AUC)。结果共纳入10篇文献(包括353例研究对象)。合并敏感度、特异度、DOR、LR+和LR-分别为88%(95%CI 77%~94%)、91%(95%CI 82%~96%)、73(95%CI 24~222)、9.5(95%CI 4.6~19)和0.13(95%CI 0.06~0.26),AUC为0.95(95%CI 0.93~0.97)。结论APT-MRI对低级别和高级别胶质瘤具有较高的鉴别诊断价值,可作为临床胶质瘤分级的可靠方法之一。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of amide proton transfer(APT)MRI for the differential diagnosis of low and high grade gliomas with a meta analysis.Methods Publications from the PubMed,Ovid,EBSCO,EMbase,CNKI,WanFang,CBM and VIP databases were comprehensively searched,and the papers that evaluating APT-MRI for the differential diagnosis of low and high grade gliomas were included.The pooled Sen,Spe,DOR,LR+and LR-were calculated,and the SROC curve was constructed with Stata 13.0 software.Results 10 papers with 353 subjects were finally included.The pooled Sen,Spe,DOR,LR+and LR-were 88%(95%CI,77-94%),91%(95%CI,82-96%),73(95%CI,24-222),9.5(95%CI,4.6-19)and 0.13(95%CI,0.06-0.26),respectively,and the area under the SROC curve was 0.95(95%CI,0.93-0.97).Conclusion APT-MRI showed good diagnostic value for differentiating low and high grade gliomas.Thus,APT-MRI could be one of reliable modalities for glioma grading in clinical practice.
作者 刘寒 韩福刚 何晓鹏 黄新文 陈光祥 LIU Han;HAN Fugang;HE Xiaopeng(Department of Radiology,Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou,Sichuan Province 646000,P.R.China)
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第9期1714-1719,共6页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 胶质瘤 分级 酰胺质子转移 化学交换饱和转移 Glioma Grading Amide proton transfer Chemical exchange saturation transfer
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献65

  • 1曾宪涛,李胜,雷晋,郭毅.Review Manager 5软件在诊断准确性试验的Meta分析中的应用[J].湖北医药学院学报,2013,32(1):6-16. 被引量:33
  • 2林杰,杨汉丰,黄小华,安学军,李杨.CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检并发症的分析[J].川北医学院学报,2007,22(6):573-575. 被引量:10
  • 3Whiting P,Rutjes AWS,Reitsma JB,et al.The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[].BMC Medical Research Methodology.2003
  • 4Deeks JJ,Bossuyt PM,Gatsonis C.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version1.0.0. http://srdta.cochrane.org . 2009
  • 5Whiting PF,Rutjes AW,Westwood ME,et al.QUADAS-2:a re-vised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies[].Annals of Internal Medicine.2011
  • 6.Review Manager (RevMan)[Computer program].Version 5.2[].Journal of Women s Health.2012
  • 7Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Dinnes J,et al.Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies[].Health Technology Assessment Reports.2004
  • 8D Moher,KF Schulz,I Simera,DG Altman.Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines[].PLoS Med.2010
  • 9Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al.Sources of variation andbias in studies of diagnostic accuracy:a systematic review[].Annals of Internal Medicine.2004
  • 10Zhang Y,Huang J,Chen M,Jiao LR.Preoperative vascular evaluation with computed tomography and magnetic reso- nance imaging for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis[].Pancre- atology.2012

共引文献144

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部