期刊文献+

颜色客观性——认知与语义角度的辩护

Color Objectivity——A Cognitive and Semantic Defense
原文传递
导出
摘要 戈麦斯-塔伦特与汉森在语义层面对颜色主客观性展开争议,为传统认知层面的讨论提供了新的研究视角。然而,双方的讨论都不曾借鉴现代色度学的相关研究结果,也未能充分刻画颜色形容词语义结构的复杂性。文章引入色度学基本理论揭示颜色系统在认知上的规律性特征,并在此基础上构造颜色形容词包含三个量级的复杂语义结构。这一语义解读能够为包含颜色形容词的语句提供真值判断的依据,从而为颜色客观论提供辩护。 Gómez-Torrente and Hansen debated over the objectivity of color at the semantic level,providing a new research perspective for the traditionally cognitive discussion.However,their debates have neglected the relevant research results of modern colorimetry,hence are unable to fully characterize the complexity of color properties.This paper introduces basic colorimetric theories to reveal the cognitive regularity of the color system,and constructs a complex semantic structure of color adjectives with three scales.This semantic interpretation can provide a basis for the comparison and judgment of colors,thus effectively responding to Hansen’s challenge and providing a defense for color objectivism.
作者 马欣欣 MA Xin-xin(School of International Studies,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 北大核心 2023年第2期17-22,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词 颜色形容词 量级 认知差异 典型颜色 color adjectives scale cognitive differences color prototype
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1徐盛桓.论荷恩的等级关系──新格赖斯会话含意理论系列研究之十[J].外国语,1995,18(1):11-17. 被引量:29
  • 2宫下尚子.关于“真”与“真的”作状语情况的考察[J].汉语学习,2002(6):38-41. 被引量:15
  • 3[Carston, R. 2009. The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication ~ 11. International Review of Pragmatics, 1 ( 1 ) :35 - 62.
  • 4Evans V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics:An Introduction [ M]. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
  • 5Grice,H. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words[M]. Cambridge: Har- vard University Press.
  • 6Hirschberg, J. 1991. A Theory of Scalar lmplicature [ M ]. New York: Garland.
  • 7Horn, L. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference:Q and R based implicature [ A ]. In D. Shiffrin (ed.). Meaning, Form, and Use in Context[ C]. Washington:Georgetown University Press.
  • 8Horn, L. 2009. WJ - 40 : Implicature, truth, and meaning [ J ]. Interna- tional Review of Pragmatics, 1 ( 1 ) :3 - 34.
  • 9Huang, Y. 2007. Pragmatics [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • 10Levinson, S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of General- ized Conversational Implicature [ M ]. Cambridge : MIT Press.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部