摘要
知识在行动解释中的作用是社会科学哲学的重要问题。韦伯的行动图景表明了解决这一问题所面临的典型困境及其理论根源;哈贝马斯和安斯康姆分别给出了走出困境的两种路径,但两者各有其不足之处;对两条回应路径的整合有助于在行动解释中捍卫一种依赖“常识”的而非文化与人性之洞见的进路。
The role of knowledge in action interpretation is an important issue in the philosophy of social sciences.Weber’s picture of action shows the typical dilemma faced in solving this problem and its theoretical roots.Habermas and Anscombe respectively give two ways to get out of the dilemma,but each has its shortcomings.The integration of the two response paths helps to defend an approach that relies on“common sense”rather than cultural and human insights in the interpretation of action.
作者
徐东舜
XU Dong-shun(School of Marxism,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
北大核心
2023年第1期29-35,共7页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology