期刊文献+

深度公众科学何以可能?——构建社会强健性知识的一种探索 被引量:2

How is the Deep Citizen Science Possible?——An Exploration of Constructing Socially Robust Knowledge
原文传递
导出
摘要 日益活跃的公众科学实践表明公众可在数据收集、初步数据分析等方面成为“科学家的助手”,公众还可深度参与知识生产,成为“科学家的同事”,但深度公众科学何以可能仍有待阐明。在对“深度公众科学”做出界定的基础上,从科学实践哲学、后常规科学以及专长规范理论角度对公众“可否参与”“为何参与”以及“如何参与”问题,做出理论阐释,进而以美国艾滋病临床研究为案例,分析了两种深度公众科学的实现方式;最后,提出了以分析冲突、参与路径和知识产出为特征的实践框架,并指出深度公众科学的局限性。 The increasingly active citizen science practices show that the public can become“scientists’assistants”in data collection,preliminary data analysis and other work.In addition,studies have pointed out that the public can also deeply participate in knowledge production and become“scientists’colleagues”.However,the possibility of deep citizen science remains to be clarified.On the basis of defining the“deep public science”,this article discussed the theoretical support of practical philosophy of science,post-normal science and norm theory of expertise,to explain three problems faced by deep citizen science,which are“whether to participate”,“why to participate”and“how to participate”,and then take the 1980 s AIDS clinical research as a case.The case shows the failure of traditional knowledge production model and two possible participatory paths.Finally,it designed a practice framework characterized by three stages and pointed out its limitation.
作者 和鸿鹏 王聪 黄小茹 HE Hong-peng;WANG Cong;HUANG Xiao-ru(Institute for Advanced Studies of Humanities and Social Science,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China;School of Humanities,University of Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing 100049,China;School of Marxism Studies,University of Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing 100049,China)
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第6期90-96,共7页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词 公众科学 知识生产 公众参与 社会强健性知识 citizen science knowledge production public participation socially robust knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1贾撤诺夫,希拉等编.2004年,《科学技术论手册》.盛晓明等译,北京理工大学出版社.
  • 2拉图尔,布鲁诺/伍尔加,史蒂夫.2004年,《实验室生活:科学事实的建构过程》,张伯霖,刁小英译,东方出版社.
  • 3诺尔一塞蒂纳,卡林.2004年,《制造知识:建构主义与科学的语境性》.王善博等译,东方出版社.
  • 4Ackermarm, R. , 1989," The New Experimentalism", British Journal for the Philosophy of Sc&nce 40, pp. 185-190.
  • 5Buchwald ,J. Z. (ed.), 1995, Scientific Practice-Theories and Stories of Doing Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Chimers, A. F. , 1999, What is This Thing Called Science? Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • 7Franklin, A. , 1999, Can That be Right? Essays on Experiment, Evidence, and Science, Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 8Galison, P. ,1997, Image and Logic, A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • 9Gooding, D. , 1990, Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment, Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 10Hacking, I. , 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献76

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部