期刊文献+

奥克兰大学课堂教学评价体系对我国建设一流本科教育的启示 被引量:5

The Enlightenment of the Evaluation System of Classroom Teaching in Auckland University to the Construction of First-class Undergraduate Education in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 一流大学建设和课堂教学质量改善需要一流的课堂教学评价。奥克兰大学作为新西兰的一所一流大学,采用形成性评价、总结性评价、同行评审教学及教学档案袋等课堂教学评价运行方式,构建了相对完善的课堂教学评价体系。基于奥克兰大学课堂教学评价体系的特点和提高学生参与课堂评价的措施,我国一流本科教育的课堂教学评价体系建设应确立发展性的评价目标、形成多样化的评价方式、加大评价过程的宣传力度、构建完善的评价反馈机制,对接我国推进"双一流"建设评价体系的现实需求。 The construction of first-class universities and the improvement of classroom teaching quality require first-class classroom teaching evaluation.As a first-class university in New Zealand,the University of Auckland adopts formative evaluation,summative evaluation,peer-reviewed teaching and teaching portfolio and other classroom teaching evaluation methods to build a relatively complete classroom teaching evaluation system.Based on the analysis of characteristics of the classroom teaching evaluation system of the University of Auckland and measures to improve student participation in classroom evaluation,it is suggested that the evaluation system construction of the first-class undergraduate education in China should establish the development evaluation goal,form the diversified evaluation methods,increase the publicity of the evaluation process,construct the perfect evaluation feedback mechanism,and connect it with the realistic demand of promoting the"double first-class"construction.
作者 韩嵩 尹文华 张宝歌 HAN Song;YIN Wenhua;ZHANG Baoge(Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,Jilin,China;College of Teacher Education,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,Zhejiang,China)
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第6期92-98,共7页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 浙江省高校重大人文社科项目攻关计划重大招标课题“高校人才培养质量保障体系研究”(2016ZB004)
关键词 奥克兰大学 课堂教学 评价体系 一流本科教育 一流大学建设 the University of Auckland classroom teaching evaluation system first-class undergraduate education first-class university construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1王笃美.学生评教的有效性稳定性分析[J].江苏高教,1996(2):23-26. 被引量:43
  • 2张华.课程与教学论[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2002..
  • 3[5]Tertiary Education Advisory Commission (2001). Shaping the System: Second Report to the Tertiary Education Advisory Commission, February p. 8. pp. 9~13.
  • 4Quality Assurance Authority of New Zealand (1999). Proposals for the Structure and Implementation of a Quality Regime for Tertiary Education, Report of the QAANZ, Pre-establishment Team.
  • 5Harvey, L & Green , D. (1993). Defining Quality, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,Vol. 18, No. 1
  • 6Standards NewZealand (1994),Quality Management and QualitAssurance- Vocabulary, Australian /New ealand Standard, As/NZS ISO 8402.
  • 7Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.Class Evaluation.http://bokcenter.harvard.edu/progs/evalns/fac4.html.2005-10-10.
  • 8胡森 & 波斯特尔斯波特.简明国际教育百科全书教学(下)[M].中央教育科学研究所比较教育研究室编译.北京:教育科学出版社.1990.235.
  • 9Torsten Husen Tneville Postlethwaite.国际教育百科全书(第8卷)[M].贵阳:贵州教育出版社.1990.531.
  • 10Lewis Raymer.Interested in Participatory Evaluation?.http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/alr26/parEval.html.2005-03-10.

共引文献45

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部