期刊文献+

职业晋升与审计质量能够“职质同趋”吗——来自审计师晋升合伙人的经验证据 被引量:8

Can Job Promotion and Audit Quality Improve Synchronously?——Empirical Evidence from Auditor Promoted to Partner
原文传递
导出
摘要 审计师晋升合伙人是个人职业角色的重大转变,会影响个人执业行为与合伙人“更新换代”效率。采用我国证券资格会计师事务所的审计师晋升合伙人前后审计的客户公司为样本,研究发现:相比晋升之前,审计师在晋升合伙人之后提供了更高质量审计服务,整体实现了“职质同趋”;然后从三个维度刻画晋升机制,新晋合伙人属于本所培养、晋升时点早、晋升难度大时,职业晋升效应更加明显;考虑作用机制,法律责任与声誉效应敦促新晋合伙人通过增加审计投入并降低审计风险,提高审计质量;此外,会计师事务所主体的人力资本结构及质控机制异质性对审计师职业晋升效应产生调节作用。研究可为审计行业监管部门及会计师事务所合伙人治理机制建设提供科学依据。 The promotion of auditor to partner is a significant change of individual’s professional role,which has an impact on the individual practice behavior and efficiency of partner replacement.Using the newly promoted partners and their client companies before and after their promotion as the research object,the results show that:compared with before promotion,auditors provide higher quality audit services after promoted to partner,and the overall realization of“job quality trend”;Then,the promotion mechanism is described from three dimensions.The promotion effect is more obvious when the new partners belong to the training of the firm,the promotion time is early and the promotion difficulty is high.Considering the mechanism of action,legal liability and reputation effect,new partners are urged to improve audit quality by increasing audit input and reducing audit risk.In addition,the human capital structure and the heterogeneity of quality control mechanism of firms have a moderating effect on auditor promotion.The research can provide scientific basis for the audit supervision department and the partner governance mechanism construction of accounting firms.
作者 闫焕民 王子佳 吴益兵 Yan Huanmin
出处 《会计研究》 北大核心 2023年第2期181-192,共12页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(72062020、71662021) 教育部人文社科项目(22YJC790141)的支持
关键词 事务所 合伙人 职业晋升 晋升机制 审计质量 Accounting Firm Partner Promotion Promotion Mechanism Audit Quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献86

  • 1秦荣生.审计风险探源:信息不对称[J].审计研究,2005(5):6-10. 被引量:44
  • 2吴联生,李辰.“先征后返”、公司税负与税收政策的有效性[J].中国社会科学,2007(4):61-73. 被引量:104
  • 3Bowen,R. , L. DuCharme, and D. Shores. 1995. Stakeholders'implicit claims and accounting method choice. Journal of Accounting and Economies 20(December) .
  • 4Becker, Defond, Jiambalvo, Subramanyarn, The Effect if AuditQuality on Earnings Management, Contemporary Accounting Research, Spring 1998.
  • 5Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney, 1995, Detecting earnings management, Accounting Review 70 (April).
  • 6DeFond, M. L. 1992. The association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switching. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11 (Spring).
  • 7Francis,J. 1984. The effect of audit finn size on audit prices: Astudy of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Eco-nomies 6 (August).
  • 8汪宁,廖建波,刘尔奎,曾晓红,杨涛.会计师事务所总分所管理相关问题研究[J].中国注册会计师,2007(8):50-53. 被引量:9
  • 9Ashbaugh, H. , R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? : Further Evidence. The Accounting Review, 78 (3) : 611 -639.
  • 10Chan, K. H, and D. , Wu. 2011. Aggregate Quasi Rents and Auditor Independence : Evidence from Audit Firm Mergers in Chi- na. Contemporary Accounting Research. , 28 ( 1 ) : 175 - 213.

共引文献777

同被引文献127

引证文献8

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部