论康德时空表象的直观性质

Intuition Property on Kant’s Representation of Space and Time

康德认为时空表象是先验感性的纯粹形式,他对时空表象直观性质的论证可以分为惟一性和无限性两个论证,从反面证明了时空表象为什么不是概念,从正面证明了时空表象为什么是直观。由于康德文本当中所存在的字面矛盾,导致康德的论证在当代遭受着国内外学者的众多批评,与此同时权威的康德研究者也为康德的论证进行了辩解和回护。结合前批判时期的文本以及康德与友人的书信,同时注意到康德哲学中对先验语言和经验语言的区分,重新审视康德的论证,对国内外的质疑做出了回应并且指出国内外学者所做出的解读乃至辩护虽然非常有力但依然存在问题。认为康德的时空表象的直观性质在康德哲学内部是可以得到澄清的,也是逻辑自洽的。

Kant argues that pure form of transcendental sensibility arises the representation of space and time,which is proved non-conceptual and intuition by two approaches,that is,the argument of singleness and that of infinitude.The thought in Kant’s argument has been criticized by misunderstanding on its contradiction,at the meanwhile,it is defended by insufficiency.Considering the text from the pre-critical period and Kant’s letters to his friends,according to methods of demarcating by Kant’s transcendental language from his empirical language,it reviews on Kant’s arguments,criticizes the insufficiency of defense,and refutes the doubts.The study shows the possibility of clarification and consistency of Kant’s intuition in Kant’s philosophy.