期刊文献+

重访“作业”:劳动教育视域下杜威课程理论与实践的当代启示

Revisiting“Occupations”:Contemporary Enlightenment of Dewey’s Curriculum Theory and Practice from the Perspective of Labor Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在杜威的课程理论和实践中居于核心位置的“作业”有着丰富的劳动意涵,杜威希望通过“作业”改变学校教育与生产劳动相分离的境况,在他的学校课程构造中为劳动教育创造了广阔的空间。在“作业”内容的选择上,杜威注重满足族群基本需求的社会劳动;在“作业”内容的组织上,他又注重以同“文化纪元论”相似的方式展现劳动在不同生产力条件下的形态和意义。同样是在学校课程中纳入劳动作业,杜威的探索与同时期的“手工训练”和“儿童研究”两大运动相比,更能突出劳动作业的社会价值,以深度嵌入社会历史情境的方式呈现劳动所蕴含的社会关系。杜威的课程理论与实践,为解决如何凸显劳动教育的思想性和社会性以及如何充分发挥传统劳动的育人价值等问题提供了有益启示。 “Occupations”,which are at the core of Dewey’s curriculum theory and practice,has rich implications with labor.Dewey hoped to change the situation that school education was separated from productive labor through“Occupations”,creating a vast space for labor education in his curriculum structure.In terms of the selection of curriculum experience,Dewey focused on social labor that meets the basic needs of ethnic groups.In terms of organization,he presented the form and significance of labor under different productivity conditions in a similar way to the cultural epoch theory.Also incorporating labor homework into school curriculum,Dewey’s exploration highlighted the social value of labor homework more than the two major movements of“manual training”and“child studies”at the same time,and showed how social relations connected by labor are deeply embedded in social and historical situations.Dewey’s curriculum theory and practice provided useful inspiration for solving problems such as how to highlight the ideological and social nature of labor education,and how to give full play to the educational value of traditional labor.
作者 王文智 刘正伟 Wang Wenzhi;Liu Zhengwei(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China;College of Education,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058,China)
出处 《教育科学》 北大核心 2023年第5期37-44,共8页 Education Science
基金 2021年国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“学生减负话语的演变研究”(项目编号:21FJKB006)
关键词 约翰·杜威 劳动教育 主动作业 课程理论 课程史 John Dewey labor education active“occupation” curriculum theory curriculum history
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献61

  • 1滕大春.他人的误解与自身的不足——关于杜威教育理论的批判和研究[J].教育研究与实验,1987(4):47-53. 被引量:9
  • 2Hamilton Ross Smith,Development of Manual Training in the United States (Lancaster,Pa.:Intelligencer Print,1914),14.
  • 3Calvin Milton Woodward,The Manual Training School (Boston:D.C.HEATH & Co.,Publishers,1887),2.
  • 4Lawrence A.Crcmin,The Transformation of the School:Progressivism in American Education,1876-1957(New York:Random House,Inc.and Alfred A.Knop f,Inc.,1961),24.
  • 5Calvin Milton Woodward,The Manual Training School (Boston:D.C.HEATH & Co.,Publishers,1887),3-4.
  • 6Charles Alpheus Bennett,History of Manual and Industrial Education,1870 to 1917 (Peoria,Illinois:The Manual Arts Press,1937),331.
  • 7Lawrence A.Cremin,The Transformation of the School:Progressivism in American Education,1876-1957 (New York:Random House,Inc.and Alfred A.Knopf,Inc.,1961),26.
  • 8Cremin,The Transformation of the School:Progressivism in American Education,1876-1957,27.
  • 9Bennett,History of Manual and Industrial Education,1870 to 1917,341.
  • 10Lazerson Marvin and W.Norton Grubb,American Education and Vocationalism:a Documentary History,1870-1970(New York:Teachers College Press,Teachers College,Columbia University,1974),59-60.

共引文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部