期刊文献+

基于Hypermesh的汽车吸能盒结构参数优化设计 被引量:2

Optimization design of structural parameters of automobile energy absorbing box based on Hypermesh
下载PDF
导出
摘要 汽车吸能盒作为保险杠内的一个重要吸能部件,在碰撞中可以起到吸收碰撞能量、保护纵梁、降低维修成本的目的,对提高整车的耐撞性具有积极作用。吸能盒板材厚度对其碰撞吸能性能有一定程度的影响。文中在Hypermesh软件中建立了吸能盒的碰撞冲击有限元模型,并对有限元仿真进行了结果验证。在结构参数优化后,对防撞梁进行模态分析,并通过对100%正面碰撞和40%偏置碰撞所产生的碰撞力和吸能时间进行低速碰撞仿真分析,结果表明,采用2 mm板材厚度的吸能盒的吸能特性性能比1.8 mm板材厚度的吸能盒的吸能特性更为优异。 As an important energy-absorbing component in the bumper,the automobile energy-absorbing box can absorb the collision energy,protect the longitudinal beam and reduce the maintenance cost in the collision,and it has a positive effect on improving the crashworthiness of the whole vehicle.The thickness of the energy-absorbing box plate has a certain influence on its impact energy-absorbing performance.In this paper,the collision impact finite element model of the energy-absorbing box is established in the Hypermesh software,and the results of the finite element simulation are verified.After the structural parameters of the energy absorption box are optimized,the modal analysis of the anti-collision beam is carried out,and the lowspeed collision simulation analysis is carried out on the collision force and energy absorption time generated by 100%frontal collision and 40%offset collision.The results show that the energy absorption characteristics of the box with 2 mm plate thickness are better than that of the box with 1.8 mm plate thickness.
作者 柳校可 袁美霞 刘琪 蔻莛彧 LIU Xiao-ke;YUAN Mei-xia;LIU Qi;KOU Ting-yu(School of Electromechanical and Vehicle Engineering,Beijing University of Architecture,Beijing 102600)
出处 《机械设计》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第S01期44-49,共6页 Journal of Machine Design
基金 北京建筑大学教育科学研究项目(Y19-14)
关键词 吸能盒 低速碰撞 有限元分析 优化设计 energy-absorbing box low-speed collision finite element analysis optimization design
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

  • 1曾会华,余雄庆.基于代理模型的气动外形优化[J].航空计算技术,2005,35(4):84-87. 被引量:12
  • 2陈困栋.基于代理模型的多目标优化方法及其在车身设计中的应用[D].长沙:湖南大学,2012.
  • 3SIMPSON T W, BOOKER A J, GHOSH D, et al. Ap- proximation methods in multidiseiplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 27 (5) : 302-313.
  • 4JIN R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. Comparative stud- ies of metamodelling techniques under multiple model- ing criteria [J]. Structural and Muhidisciplinary Opti- mization, 2001, 23(1) : 1-13.
  • 5SIMPSON T W, POPLINSKI J D, KOCH P N, et al. Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations [J]. Engineering with Computers, 2001, 17(2): 129-150.
  • 6MARDIA K V, MARSHALL R J. Maximum likelihood estimation of models for residual covariance in spatial regression[J]. Biometrika, 1984, 71( 1 ) : 135-146.
  • 7张德虎,高正红,李焦赞,等.代理模型选样准则研究[J].空气动力力学学报,2011,29(6):719-725,732.
  • 8JEONG S, MURAYAMA M, YAMAMOTO K. Effi- cient optimization design method using kriging model [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(2) : 413-420.
  • 9ALEXANDER J M. An approximate analysis of the col- lapse of thin cylindrical shells under axi',fl load[ J ]. Quar- terly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 1969(214) :5.
  • 10KIM H S. New extruded muhi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash energy absorption and weight efficieney [ J ]. Thin-Walled Structures,2002 (40) :311 - 327.

共引文献19

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部