期刊文献+

考虑风险规避和资金约束的低碳供应链决策研究 被引量:1

Study on Decision-making for Low-carbon Supply Chain with Capital Constraint and Risk Aversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了缓解低碳环境下资金约束制造商融资难的问题,在“碳限额与交易”制度下,建立了由风险中性供应商主导、损失规避制造商跟随的Stackelberg博弈模型。假设在制造商的融资同时用于订购和减排投资决策的情形下,分别得出了风险中性和损失规避制造商的最优订购和减排决策,以及供应商的最优批发定价决策。理论和算例分析表明,制造商的损失规避度越高,制造商将采取更加保守的订购策略,这会促使供应商提高批发价格,从而使得制造商降低减排水平。制造商的损失规避性对自身期望效用的影响与政府分配的碳排放上限有关。当碳排放上限较大时,具有较高损失规避度的制造商可以在排放权交易市场出售更多剩余的排放许可量来获得额外的收益。 In order to alleviate the financing difficulties of capital-constrained manufacturers in low-carbon environment,a Stackelberg game model is established in government’s cap-and-trade system,which is led by a risk-neutral supplier and followed by a loss-averse manufacturer.Based on the assumption that the manufacturer borrows two loans to execute the ordering decision and make emission reduction investment,the optimal ordering and emission reduction decisions of the risk-neutral and loss-averse manufacturer and the optimal wholesale pricing decision of the supplier are obtained,respectively.Theoretical and numerical analysis show that when the manufacturer is loss-averse,it will make more conservative order decisions,and the supplier will set a higher wholesale price.As a result,the manufacturer reduces the emission reduction level.The impact of loss aversion on the expected utility of the manufacturer is related to carbon cap allocated by the government.When carbon cap is large,the manufacturer with higher loss aversion can earn additional gains by selling more remaining emission permits in the carbon permit trading markets.
作者 李莉英 刘光安 李小兵 王博 LI Li-ying;LIU Guang-an;LI Xiao-bing;WANG Bo(College of Mathematics and Statistics,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China)
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第S02期950-955,共6页 Computer Science
基金 重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0076) 重庆市研究生导师团队建设项目(JDDSTD201802)
关键词 碳限额 碳排放权交易 损失规避 供应链融资 Carbon emission quota Carbon permit trade Loss aversion Supply chain finance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献63

  • 1许明辉,于刚,张汉勤.带有缺货惩罚的报童模型中的CVaR研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(10):1-8. 被引量:92
  • 2佟新华,段海燕.中日清洁发展机制项目合作研究[J].现代日本经济,2007,26(2):11-14. 被引量:6
  • 3朱文贵,朱道立,徐最.延迟支付方式下的存货质押融资服务定价模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(12):1-7. 被引量:78
  • 4Carrillo-Hermosilla J, del Rio Gonzalez P, Konnola T. Eco-innovation: When sustainability and competitiveness shakehands[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group,2014: 1-10.
  • 5Eiadat Y, Kelly A, Roche G,et al. Green and Competitive?An Empirical Test of the Mediating Role of EnvironmentalInnovation Stxategy[J], J of World Business, 2008,43(2):131-145.
  • 6Schiederig T, Tietze F, Herstatt C. Green innovation intechnology and innovation management: An exploratoryliterature review[J]. R&D Management, 2012,42(2): 180-192.
  • 7Liu Z, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer environmentalawareness and competition in two-stage supply chains [J].European J of Operational Research, 2012, 218(3): 602-613.
  • 8Matthews H S, Hendrickson C T, Weber C L. Theimportance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries [J].Environmental Science and Technology, 2008,42(16):5839-5842.
  • 9Nair A, Narasimhan R. Dynamics of competing withquality-and advertising-based goodwill[J]. European J ofOperational Research, 2006, 175(1): 462-474.
  • 10El Ouardighi F, Pasin F. Quality improvement and good-will accumulation in a dynamic duopoly [J]. European J ofOperational Research, 2006, 175(2): 1021-1032.

共引文献173

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部