期刊文献+

基于反事实模拟的中国股市涨跌停板磁吸效应研究 被引量:4

Magnet Effect of Price Limits in China’s Stock Markets Based on Counterfactual Simulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 磁吸效应是市场接近涨跌停板或者熔断阈值时市场价格加速向阈值运动的现象.从反事实模拟思想出发,本文提出类直接比较法,从概率的视角检验中国股票市场中涨跌停板前磁吸效应的特征.即通过类直接比较法生成反事实模拟,构建没有涨跌停限制假设之下股票价格运动的条件概率分布,以此与实际条件概率比较来考察磁吸效应.研究发现,中国股票市场涨跌停板前存在磁吸效应,并且跌停前更强;估值难度、交易活跃程度越高的股票,其磁吸效应越强;相比于开盘股价即接近涨跌停板价的情况,盘中股价接近涨跌停板价的情况下磁吸效应更强.本文还发现磁吸效应的一个可能原因是机构投资者的流动性需求. Magnet effect is the phenomenon that the price accelerates toward the price limits or circuit breaker when price approaches them.We design a quasi-direct comparison method based on counterfactual simulation to test the effect near price limit events in China’s stock markets.We first construct the theoretical conditional probability distribution of price movement under the counterfactual condition that there isn’t price limit policy,and compare the theoretical and practical conditional probabilities.The results show that magnet effect exists in China’s stock markets,and is stronger near lower price limit than near upper price limit.Further,we find that magnet effect is stronger in harder-to-value stocks and more active-trading stocks.Magnet effect is stronger when a price limit event occurs at the middle of the trading day than what at the opening period of the trading day.One possible reason of magnet effect might be institutional investors’demand for liquidity.
作者 陆昌 刘洋 杨晓光 LU Chang;LIU Yang;YANG Xiaoguang(Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;E Fund Management Company Limited,Beijing 100033,China)
出处 《计量经济学报》 2021年第1期217-232,共16页 China Journal of Econometrics
基金 国家自然科学基金(71532013,71850008)
关键词 涨跌停板 磁吸效应 反事实模拟 price limits magnet effect counterfactual simulation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献38

  • 1靳庭良,喻东.涨跌停板制度对沪深股市不同期限股指收益率波动性的影响[J].统计与决策,2005,21(04X):76-79. 被引量:7
  • 2李超.中国股市涨跌停板对投资者交易行为的影响[J].中央财经大学学报,2005(9):30-34. 被引量:12
  • 3杨晓兰.涨跌幅限制对证券市场影响的实验经济学研究[J].南方经济,2006,35(10):5-16. 被引量:8
  • 4《证券监管与新兴经济的成长》,美商业部官员埃弗里特·艾利茨在美国证券交易委员会举办的第15届证券市场发展国际研讨会上的发言,《中国证券报》1996年8月31日
  • 5Brennan M J.A theory of price limits in futures markets[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1986,16,213-233.
  • 6Greenwald B C,Stein J C.Transactional risk,market crashes,and the role of circuit breakers[J].The Journal of Business,1991,64(4):446-462.
  • 7Ma C K,et al.Limit moves and price resolution:the case of the treasury bond futures market[J].The Journal of Futures Market,1989,9(4):321-330.
  • 8Fama E F,French K R.Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies[J].Journal of Financial,1996,51(1):55-84.
  • 9Kim K A,et al.Price limit performance:evidence from the Tokyo Exchange[J].Journal of Finance,1997,52:885-901.
  • 10Chan S H,et al.Price limit performance:evidence from transactions data and the limit order book[J].Journal of Empirical Finance,2005,12:269-290.

共引文献32

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部