大学生学习倦怠团体辅导方案设计及干预效果

Study on the design of group counseling program and the effect of intervention on college students’ learning burnout

目的:帮助学习倦怠的大学生增进对自我的认识,认清学习倦怠的原因,建立合理的学习认知和行为。方法:采用杨丽娴、连榕编制的大学生学业倦怠量表,筛选出有学习倦怠的大学生,通过一对一面谈确定40人为团体被试,其中团体干预组20人,对照组20人。结合学习倦怠学生的特征表现,并从认知、情感、行为三方面切入,设计团体辅导方案。团体活动连续开展8周,每周1次,每次120分钟。对干预组进行团体辅导活动,对照组不采取措施。结果:团体辅导前干预组和对照组在情绪低落、行为不当、成就感低三维度以及学习倦怠的总分上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);团体辅导后干预组的学习倦怠总分以及情绪低落、行为不当维度的得分显著低于对照组(t=-5.236,-3.269,-2.033;P<0.01),而在成就感低维度上干预组与对照组不存在统计学差异(P>0.05);在团体效果追踪期,干预组在学习倦怠总分及情绪低落、行为不当维度上的得分均显著低于对照组(t=-5.368,-2.612,-2.154;P<0.05),而在成就感低维度上干预组和对照组同样不存在统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:本团体辅导方案设计合理,干预效果明显。

Objective:To help college students with learning burnout to improve their self-awareness,recognize the causes of learning burnout,and to establish reasonable learning cognition and behavior.Methods:By Yang Li-xian and Lian Rong’s"College Student Burnout scale",students with moderate learning burnout were screened out.Through one-to-one interview,40 people were selected as group subjects,including 20 in group intervention group and 20 in control group.Depending on the characteristics of learning burnout students,group counseling program from the cognitive,emotional,behavioral three aspects was designed.The group activities lasted for 8 weeks,once a week,120 minutes each time.Group counseling was conducted in the intervention group and no measures were taken in the control group.Results:There was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in the depression,improper behavior,low achievement,and the total score of learning burnout before group counseling.After group counseling,the scores of learning burnout,depression and improper behavior in intervention group were significantly lower than those in control group(t=-5.236,-3.269,-2.033;P<0.01),and there was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in the low sense of achievement(t=-4.685,P>0.05).In group effect tracking period,the scores of learning burnout,depression and improper behavior in intervention group were significantly lower than those in control group(t=-5.368,-2.612,-2.154;P<0.05),and in the low sense of achievement,the intervention group and the control group also showed no significant difference.Conclusion:The group counseling program design is reasonable,the intervention effect is obvious.