期刊文献+

金融发展、金融开放与股权资产的本国偏好

Financial Development, Financial Openness and Equity Home Bias
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于EWN数据库以及WDI数据库,对全球股权资产的本国偏好程度进行测算,发现股权资产的本国偏好普遍存在,且发展中国家股权资产的本国偏好程度高于发达国家。为研究此现象形成的原因,本文基于93个经济体1995—2015年的跨国面板数据,实证检验了金融发展以及金融开放因素对股权资产本国偏好的重要影响。研究发现:金融发展水平的提高既能够提高本国的对外股权投资能力,也可以促进本国股市规模的扩大,对股权资产本国偏好的影响具有不确定性;而金融开放可以显著降低股权资产的本国偏好程度,且对发展中经济体的影响更大。本文的回归结果在改变样本划分方法、替换核心解释变量、加入更多解释变量、使用系统GMM(广义矩估计)的方法处理内生性等稳健性检验中均保持一致。由此可见,发展中国家金融开放程度的不足是导致其股权资产本国偏好程度较高的重要原因。 Based on EWN database and WDI database, this paper estimates the degree of equity home bias of all the countries available and finds out that it is stronger in developing countries than in advanced countries. In order to investigate the cause, this paper tests the vital effects of financial development and financial openness on equity home bias respectively based on the cross-border data of 93 economies from 1995 to 2015. The empirical analysis shows that since financial development can improve the foreign equity investment and the home stock market capitalization as well, the influence on equity home bias basically remains uncertain;financial openness can significantly reduce the degree of equity home bias, with more prominent influence in the samples of developing countries. The conclusions are robust when changing the subsamples, substituting core independent variables, adding more variables, using systematic GMM regression. This proves that the deficiency of financial openness in developing countries mainly explain the higher degree of equity home bias than that in advanced countries.
作者 王伟 徐子桐 王茜 Wang Wei;Xu Zitong;Wang Xi
出处 《金融学季刊》 2020年第3期1-26,共26页 Quarterly Journal of Finance
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71603291、71703173)的资助
关键词 金融发展水平 金融开放程度 股权资产本国偏好 推力因素 拉力因素 financial development financial openness equity home bias push factor pull factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献50

  • 1Alesina, A. and Wagner, A. "Choosing ( and Reneging on) Exchange Rate Regimes. " Journal of the European Eco- nomic Association, 2006, 4 (4), pp. 770-799.
  • 2Allen, F. and Gale, G. Comparing Financial Systems. MIT Press, 2000, pp. 40-80.
  • 3Barajas, A. ; Erickson, L. and Steiner, R. "Fear of Declaring: Do Markets Care What Countries Say about Their Ex- change Rate Policies?" IMF Staff Papers , 2008, 55 (3) , pp. 445-480.
  • 4Bearce, D. H. and Hallerberg, M. "Democracy and De Facto Exchange Rate Regimes. " Economics and Politics, 2011, 23 (2), pp. 172-194.
  • 5Berdiev, A. N. ; Kim, Y. and Chang, C P. "The Political Economy of Exchange Rate Regimes in Developed and De- veloping Countries. " European Journal of Political Economy, 2012, 28 ( 1 ) , pp. 38-53.
  • 6Bernhard, W. and Leblang, D. "Democratic Institutions and Exchange-Rate Commitments. " International Organiza- tion, 1999, 53 (1), pp. 71-97.
  • 7Bordo, M. D. "Exchange Rate Regime Choice in Historical Perspective. " NBER Working Paper, No. 9654, 2003.
  • 8Bordo, M. D. and Flandreau, M. C. "Periphery, Exchange Rate Regimes and Globalization. " NBER Working Paper, No. 8584, 2001.
  • 9Broz, L. J. "Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. " International Organization, 2002, 56 (4), pp. 861-887.
  • 10Broz, L. ; Frieden, J. and Weymouth, S. "Exchange Rate Policy Attitudes: Direct Evidence from Survey Data. " IMF Staff Papers , 2008, 55 (3), pp. 417-444.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部