市场外生型价格暴利垄断行为的规制路径

Regulatory Path of Exogenous Price-profiteering Monopoly Behavior in the Market

由于市场外生型价格暴利行为具有多元与复杂的产生原因,因而该种行为可能触发多个部门法的规制。在反垄断法规制视角下,行政行为与由其所导致的价格暴利垄断行为之间存在多种形态的内在关联性;在统一规制此类市场外生型价格暴利垄断行为的情形下,现行反垄断法律制度不仅未包含具象化、明晰化与实操化的标准,而且欠缺关于法律责任的公平分担机制。基于此境况,反垄断法的修法机关有必要在《反垄断法》中植入具有统合性与实操性的法律责任认定标准与承担机制,并建构"受到市场外生型价格暴利垄断行为损害的经营者与消费者"的利益补偿机制。而反垄断法的修法机关与实施机关亦有必要设立新型的"价格不公平性标准",并厘定具有价格暴利属性的行政垄断行为的细化类型,进而借鉴欧盟成熟的模式创设关于国家援助行为的法定评判标准体系。

Due to the multiple and complex causes of exogenous price profiteering in the market,this situation may trigger the regulation of various departmental laws.There are various forms of internal correlation between organizational and monopoly behavior.Under the unified regulation of exogenous monopoly behaviors of exogenous prices,the current anti-monopoly legal system not only does not include standards for concreteness,clarity,and practicality but also lacks a fair sharing mechanism for legal liability.Based on this situation,it is necessary for the anti-monopoly law amendment agency to incorporate a practical legal responsibility determination standard and commitment mechanism in the Anti-Monopoly Law.And to construct a benefits compensation mechanism that makes up for the people who damaged by the exogenous Price-profiteering Monopoly Behavior.Besides,the anti-monopoly law amendment and implement agencies also need to set up a new type of"price unfairness standards"and determine the type of administrative monopoly behavior with price-profiteering attributes and then draw on the EU’s mature model to create a system of legal judgment standards.