期刊文献+

基于OpenSees的场地条件对RC框架结构易损性影响初探

Analysis of the influence of site conditions on the fragility of RC frame structures based on OpenSees program
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前对于结构易损性的研究主要倾向于考虑结构模型的多样化、精细化,而忽略或者简化场地土层条件的影响。基于OpenSees平台建立基岩和土层上两跨两层、两跨六层的RC框架结构的简化模型,选取54条峰值加速度大于0.8m/s^(2)地震动记录作为输入,通过数值模拟得到结构的易损性曲线。通过易损性曲线对比分析,结果显示:1)轻微破坏性能水准下,不同场地条件及结构层数工况得到的易损性曲线基本一致;2)除轻微破坏外各破坏性能水准下,土层的存在明显降低了结构破坏的概率;3)不严重破坏性能水准下,场地条件为基岩时,层数越高,越易破坏;场地条件为土层时,层数越低,越易破坏;4)严重破坏性能水准下,土层场地上结构未发生严重破坏;基岩场地的结构在输入峰值加速度大于0.4g时出现严重破坏,且六层结构的易损性曲线略高于两层结构。 The current research on fragility mainly considers the diversity,and precisely simulation of performance of structural components,but ignoring or simplifying the effect of site conditions.Using OpenSees program,simplified models of two-span,two-story and two-span,six-stories RC frame structures sitting on bedrock or soil sites are built.Collecting 54 ground-motion records which peak ground-motion acceleration exceeds 0.8 m/s^(2),numerical simulations are carried out by seismically loading,and that fragility curves are obtained and comparatively analyzed.The analytical results indicate that:1)the fragility curves obtained for different site conditions and different numbers of stories are basically staying consistent when RC structure experiences light damage levels;2)the presence of soil site tends to reduce the probability of structural damage for various damage performance levels except slight damage;3)for structures in less severe damage level,the possibility of damage of the six-story structure on rock site is higher than that of two-story structure,while such tendency remains opposite for soil site condition;4)under severe damage performance level,structures on soil site are not severely damaged;while structures on rock site are severely damaged when input peak ground-motion acceleration is greater than 0.4g,and the fragility curve of the six-story structure remains higher than that of the two-story structure.
作者 费扬 陈龙伟 FEI Yang;CHEN Longwei(Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration,Harbin 150080,China;Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation,Ministry of Emergency Management,Harbin 150080,China)
出处 《建筑结构》 北大核心 2023年第S02期724-729,共6页 Building Structure
基金 中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2021EEEVL0104)。
关键词 地震易损性 场地条件 OPENSEES RC框架结构 简化模型 seismic fragility analysis site conditions OpenSees RC structure simplified modelling
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1王汝恒,贾彬,邓安福,王皆伟.砂卵石土动力特性的动三轴试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(z2):4059-4064. 被引量:42
  • 2丁阳,郭峰,李忠献.地震作用下空间网架结构考虑损伤累积效应的弹塑性分析[J].工程力学,2005,22(1):54-58. 被引量:19
  • 3SEED H B, IDRISS I M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(SM9): 1249-1273.
  • 4SEED R B, CETIN K O, MOSS R E S, et al. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering, a unified and consistent framework[R]. EERC, USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2003.
  • 5KU C S, LEE D H, WU J H. Evaluation of soil liquefaction in the Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake using CPT[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2004, 24(9/10): 659--673.
  • 6中国地震局工程力学研究所.GB/T18208.3-2000地震现场工作第三部分:调查规范【s].北京:中国标准出版社,2000.
  • 7GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 8GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[s].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
  • 9刘恢先.唐山大地震震害[M].北京:地震出版社,1989.33-160.
  • 10中华人民共和国国家标准编写组.GB50011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.

共引文献220

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部