期刊文献+

优先原则在汉语非赞同评价中的体现

Preference Principles Operating in the Disagreements withAssessment in Chinese Conversation
原文传递
导出
摘要 会话分析已有研究认为,交际中的评价序列普遍遵循“尽可能避免或减少不同意、不确定和拒绝”的优先原则。然而,这种单一原则简化了交际中所实施行为的复杂性。鉴于此,本研究聚焦汉语会话的评价行为,对电话通话录音和日常会话录像中的26例非赞同评价进行分析。研究发现,汉语交际者对贬低、称赞、抱怨这三种行为的回应在话轮设计上显示了不赞同、不接受或部分接受等特征,这表明汉语非赞同评价中存在冲突性优先原则或多重优先原则。 It has been agreed among conversation analysts that assessment sequences generally operate under the preference principle of"avoiding or reducing disagreements,disconfirmations and rejections if possible".However,researchers’proposal of the single preference principle is oversimplifying the complexity of actions occurring in interaction.In view of such problem,this study analyzes 26 excerpts of disagreeing assessment from Chinese phone calls and videos.It is found that participants’dispreferred responses to three types of actions—deprecation,compliment,and complaint—display features such as disapproval,dismissal and partial rejection in their turn design.This proves the existence of conflicting preference principles in ordinary Chinese conversation.
作者 李梅 Li Mei(Shanghai International Studies University)
出处 《话语研究论丛》 2021年第1期114-127,共14页 Discourse Studies Forum
基金 2019年度上海外国语大学校级一般科研项目“会话分析视角下的汉语评价研究”(规划项目)(项目编号:2019114005)阶段性成果 中央高校基本科研业务费资助
关键词 优先原则 汉语会话 非赞同评价 冲突性原则 多重原则 preference principle Chinese conversation disagreeing assessment conflicting principles multiple principles
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1程朝阳.“是吧?/!”在司法调解中的语用功能研究——以北京燕山法院的三个调解实例为基础[J].修辞学习,2006(4):48-51. 被引量:5
  • 2Heritage J,Raymond G.The Terms of Agreement:IndexingEpistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Se-quences [ J ].Social Psychology Quarterly,2005,68:15-38.
  • 3Schegloff E A.Issues of Relevance for Discourse Analysis:Contingency in Action,Interaction and Co-Participant Con-text [ J ].Computational and Conversational Discourse NATO ASI Series,1996,151:3-35.
  • 4Sidnell J,Stivers T.The Handbook of Conversation Analysis [ M ].London:Wiley-Blaekwel1,2011:13-17.
  • 5张国强.日语助词用例[M].北京:北京工业大学出版社,1989:178-179.
  • 6Hayano K.Claiming Epistemic Primacy:Yo-marked As-sessments in Japanese [ M ]//Stivers T,Mondada L,Steen-sig J.The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation.Cam-bridge:Cambridge University Press,2011.
  • 7加藤重广.文末助词「ね][よ」の談話構点機能[J].富山大学人文学部紀美,2001,第35号:31-48.
  • 8今村和宏.終助詞「よ][ね」の「語りかけタイプ」と体の動き[J].方言语文化,2011(48):35-51.
  • 9白川博之.終助詞「よ」の機能[ J].日本法教育,1992(77):36-48.
  • 10..北京大学中国语言学研究中心CCL语料数据库http ://ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus/index.jsp? dir = xiandai,.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部