期刊文献+

腹主动脉球囊阻断术对凶险性前置胎盘出血及感染风险的影响 被引量:1

The effect of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion on the risk of pernicious placenta previa bleeding and infection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹主动脉球囊阻断术对凶险性前置胎盘异常出血及感染风险的影响。方法回顾性分析2016年9月~2019年6月于淮安市妇幼保健院分娩且术前经超声及MRI检查提示为凶险性前置胎盘者100例。根据剖宫产术前是否行腹主动脉球囊阻断术将其分为球囊组(n=54)和传统组(n=46)。球囊组行低位腹主动脉球囊阻断术,传统组行传统剖宫产手术。比较两组术中出血量、输血量、术后抗生素应用时间、手术时间、产后住院时间,并分析产后出血、子宫切除、产后感染、失血性休克、转入ICU发生率。利用阿氏评分(Apgar评分)分析新生儿出生后1 min及5 min的窒息情况。术后电话随访6个月,分析两组月经复潮时间、恶露持续时间、不良事件发生情况。结果球囊组术中出血量、输血量均低于传统组,手术时间较传统组显著缩短(P<0.05)。球囊组产后出血率为12.96%,较传统组的30.43%显著降低(P<0.05)。两组新生儿1 min、5 min Apgar评分比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。球囊组术后有4例产妇出现动脉穿刺部位疼痛,但均为轻微疼痛,无需用药,症状于3~5 d内完全缓解,有1例下肢出现轻度血栓,经保守干预后,症状彻底缓解。球囊组恶露持续时间较传统组显著缩短(P<0.05),两组月经复潮时间比较无差异(P>0.05),且月经量、经期较孕前均无明显改变。结论与单纯剖宫产手术相比,低位腹主动脉球囊阻断术除能有效控制产后出血率外,还可缩短恶露持续时间,产后6个月内未见患者出现严重不良事件,安全性高。 Objective To explore the effect of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion on the risk of pernicious placenta previa bleeding and infection.Methods A retrospective analysis of 100 cases of placenta previa in Huai’an Maternal and Child Health Hospital from September 2016 to June 2019 was made.According to whether abdominal aortic balloon occlusion was performed before cesarean section,the patients were divided into balloon group(n=54)and traditional group(n=46).In the balloon group,abdominal aortic balloon occlusion was performed,while in the traditional group,traditional cesarean section was performed.The bleeding volume,blood transfusion volume,postoperative antibiotic application time,operation time and postpartum hospitalization time were compared between the two groups,and the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage,hysterectomy,postpartum infection,hemorrhagic shock and transfer to ICU were analyzed.Asphyxia was analyzed by Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes after birth.The patients in the two groups were followed up for 6 months by telephone.The time of menorrhea,duration of lochia and adverse events were analyzed.Results The amount of bleeding and blood transfusion in the balloon group were lower than those in the traditional group,and the operation time was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group(P<0.05).The postpartum hemorrhage rate of the balloon group was 12.96%,which was significantly lower than that of the traditional group(30.43%)(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in Apgar scores between the two groups(P>0.05).In the balloon group,there were 4 cases of pain in the puncture site of the artery,but all of them were slight pain,without medication,the symptoms were completely relieved within 3~5 days,and there was 1 case of mild thrombus in the lower extremity.After conservative intervention,the symptoms were completely relieved.The duration of lochia in the balloon group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group(P<0.05).There was no difference between the two groups in the time of menstruation(P>0.05),and there was no significant change in the amount and period of menstruation.Conclusion Compared with simple cesarean section,low abdominal aortic balloon occlusion can not only effectively control the rate of postpartum hemorrhage,but also shorten the duration of lochia.No serious adverse events occurred within 6 months postpartum,so it is safe.
作者 魏云波 张曙萱 WEI Yun-bo;ZHANG Shu-xuan(Department of Obstetrics,Huai’an Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Huai’an 223002,China;Department of Obstetrics,Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University,Xuzhou 221000,China)
出处 《哈尔滨医科大学学报》 CAS 2020年第4期419-423,共5页 Journal of Harbin Medical University
基金 江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F201707)
关键词 凶险性前置胎盘 腹主动脉球囊阻断术 异常出血 感染 pernicious placenta previa balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta abnormal bleeding infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献107

  • 1温玲兰,章瑞萍,李姝楠.彩色多普勒超声对前置胎盘的诊断价值[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2012,34(S2):285-286. 被引量:1
  • 2袁蜀豫,张艳,陈炜卿,李玉英,邱华豪.农村妇女产褥期营养及卫生行为与健康的关系[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(4):435-436. 被引量:13
  • 3Shrivastava V, Nageotte M, Major C, et al. Case-control comparison of cesarean hysterectomy with and without prophylactic placement of intravascular balloon catheters for placenta accreta [J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2007,197(4) :402. el-402, e5.
  • 4Sadashivaiah J, Wilson R, Thein A, et aI. Role of pmphylactic uterine artery balloon catheters in the management of women with suspected placenta accreta [J]. Int J 0bstet Anesth, 2011,20: 282-287.
  • 5Yi KW, Oh M J, Seo TS, et al. Prophylactic hypogastric artery ballooning in a patient with complete placenta previa and increta [ J ]. Journal of Korean medical science, 2010,25 (4) : 651-655.
  • 6Thabet A, Kalva SP, Liu B, et al. Interventional radiology in pregnancy complications : indications, technique, and methods for minimizing radiation exposure [J ]. Radiographics, 2011,32 ( 1 ) : 255-274.
  • 7Sawada A, Miyashita R, Edanaga M, et al. Anesthetic management of caesarean section using common iliac artery balloon occlusion in patients with placenta previa [j]. Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology, 2011,60 (12) : 1401- 1404.
  • 8Cho Y, Rizvi C, Uppal T, et al. Ultrasonographic visualization of balloon placement for uterine tamponade in massive primary postpartum hemorrhage [J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2008,32(5 ) : 711-713.
  • 9Patel SJ, Reede DL, Katz DS, et al. Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations [J]. Radiographics, 2007,27 (6) : 1705- 1722.
  • 10ApgarV.A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant[J].Curr Res Anesth Analg,1953,32(4):260–267.

共引文献292

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部