期刊文献+

MRI在直肠癌术前分期及ADC值在直肠癌预后评价中的应用 被引量:6

Diagnosis in staging rectal cancer by using MRI and the ADC value assessing the prognosis in rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨MRI在直肠癌术前分期及ADC值在直肠癌预后评价中的应用价值。方法回顾2017年9月~2019年4月我院收治的35例术前未行新辅助治疗且术后病理证实为直肠癌的患者以及15例健康志愿者的术前MRI资料,对35例直肠癌患者的MRI T分期结果与术后病理结果比较,并分析不同病理类型、分化程度、T分期、EMVI性质及CEA水平的直肠癌之间ADC值的差异。结果MRI对T分期的总准确率为68.6%,对T1~T2、T3、T4期的诊断准确率分别为54.5%、77.3%、50%,MRI术前T分期与术后病理学T分期一致性较好(P<0.05)。ADC值在健康人群与直肠癌人群、不同分化程度直肠癌组间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ADC值在黏液腺癌与非黏液腺癌、T分期、EMVI及CEA组间的差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论3.0T MRI可以作为有效预测直肠癌T分期的无创性检查方式。ADC值随着直肠癌恶性程度升高而呈下降趋势,其可以作为预测直肠癌良恶性程度的重要指标。 Objective To assess the accuracy of MRI evaluating T stage in rectal cancer,in the meanwhile analyze the relationship between tumoral apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)value and aggressive factors.Methods The clinical data of 35 patients not undergoing preoperative chemoradiation with postoperative pathologically proven rectal cancer and 15 healthy people from September 2017 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.The results of 35 patients between preoperative MRI assessing T staging and postoperative pathological TN stage were compared.Analyse the differences of ADC values among pathological type,differentiation,T staging,EMVI and CEA level groups.Results The accuracy of preoperative MRI T,T1~T2,T3,T4 staging were 68.6%,54.5%,77.3%,50%,respectively.There was statistical significance between preoperative MRI T staging and postoperative pathological T staging(P<0.05).The ADC values between rectum of healthy people and different differentiated rectal cancer had significant difference.The ADC values between adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma,T staging,EMVI and CEA groups had no statistical significance.Conclusion3.0 T MRI could be an effective noninvasive examination predicting T staging.ADC values decrease as the grade malignancy increase,so it can be an important indicator of grade malignancy in rectal cancer.
作者 卢倩颖 付旷 LU Qian-ying;FU Kuang(Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150001,China)
出处 《哈尔滨医科大学学报》 CAS 2020年第3期302-305,共4页 Journal of Harbin Medical University
关键词 直肠癌 磁共振成像 表观扩散系数 T分期 rectal cancer magnetic resonance imaging apparent diffusion coefficient T staging
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1Keane C, Young M. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2014, 84: 758-762.
  • 2Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery [J]. Lancet, 2001, 357:497-504.
  • 3Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations[J]. Neoplasia, 2009,11: 102-125.
  • 4Kaur H, Choi H, You YN, et a1. MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal cancer: practical considerations [J]. Radiographics, 2012,32: 389-409.
  • 5Cho SH, Kim SH, Bae JH, et al. Prognostic stratification by extramural depth of tumor invasion of primary rectal cancer based on the Radiological Society of North America proposal [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014,202:1238-1244.
  • 6Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Takahashi M. Ultrafast MR imaging of the abdomen: echo planar imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1998,8:367-374.
  • 7Tong T, Yao Z, Xu L, et al. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in rectal cancer: Associating with prognostic factors and ADC value [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014,40: 738-744.
  • 8Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, et al. Preoperative highresolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I , II, and ill rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study[J]. Ann Surg, 2011 ,253:711-719.
  • 9Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making [J]. Ann Oncol, 2012,23:2479-2516.
  • 10Akashi M, Nakahusa Y, Yakabe T, et al. Assessment of aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3- T MRI: correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential imaging biomarker and histologic prognostic factors [J]. Acta Radiol, 2013,55 :524-531.

共引文献61

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部