期刊文献+

人力资源管理领域的纵向研究设计与数据分析 被引量:1

Longitudinal Design and Data Analyses in the Research Field of Human Resource Management
原文传递
导出
摘要 相对于横断面研究,纵向研究可以为建立变量之间的因果关系提供更好的证据。而在不同的纵向研究方法中,面板研究具有其独特的优势,常被用来检验变量之间复杂的动态关系。在本文中,笔者围绕纵向研究,梳理了相关的文献。笔者首先讨论了纵向研究设计中常见的问题与挑战,然后分别介绍了四种常用的面板数据的分析方法(随机系数模型、潜在增长模型、交叉滞后模型、潜变化分数模型),并对各自的优缺点和适用范围进行了分析。 Longitudinal studies can provide stronger evidence for establishing the causal relationships among variables than cross-sectional studies.Among various longitudinal designs,panel design has its unique advantages and is often used to examine the complex dynamic relationships.In this paper,we first discussed the common issues in longitudinal studies,then introduced four popular approaches to modeling change(i.e.,random coefficient modeling,latent growth modeling,cross-lagged panel modeling,latent change score modeling),and finally analyzed their respective advantages,disadvantages and scope of application.
作者 王海江 胡巧婷 WANG Haijiang;HU Qiaoting(School of Management,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074;School of Management,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310000)
出处 《人力资源管理评论》 2019年第1期44-59,共16页 Human Resource Management Review
关键词 纵向研究 面板研究 随机系数模型 潜在增长模型 交叉滞后模型 潜变化分数模型 Longitudinal Studies Panel Study Random Coefficient Modeling(RCM) Latent Growth Modeling(LGM) Cross-Lagged Panel Modeling(CLPM) Latent Change Score Modeling(LCS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Drasgow F. Biased test items and differential validity. Psychological Bulletin,1982, 92: 526~531
  • 2[2]Bobko P, Kehoe J F. On the fair use of bias: a comment on Drasgow. Psychology Bulletin, 1983, 93: 604~608
  • 3[3]Drasgow F. Scrutinizing psychological tests: measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95: 34~135
  • 4[4]Drasgow F. Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied psychology, 1987, 72: 19~29
  • 5[5]Byrne B M, Shavelson R J, Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures:the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 1989,105: 456~466
  • 6[6]Drasgow F, Kanfer R. Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70: 662~680
  • 7[7]Idaszak J R, Bottom W P, Drasgow F. A test of the measurement equivalence of the revised job diagnostic survey: past problems and current solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73: 647~656
  • 8[8]Facteau J D, Craig S B. Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 88: 215~227
  • 9[9]Maurer T J, Raju N S, Collins W C. Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83: 693~702
  • 10[10]Mullen M R. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 1995, 26: 573~596

共引文献47

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部