期刊文献+

SF-36量表评价某县农村老年人的生活质量 被引量:15

Evaluation of life quality of the rural elderly in a county by SF-36 scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解某县农村地区居民的生活质量和医疗现状。方法采用随机整群抽样的方法,使用简明健康调查问卷(SF-36和自制量表)对居民进行实名问卷调查。结果SF-36量表的Cronbach’sα系数>0.8,KMO值>0.6。将该县农村60岁以上人群各维度评分与河南省农村老年人各维度评分比较,活力(VT)维度评分低于常模,生理功能(PF)、躯体疼痛(BP)、总体健康状况(GH)、社会功能(SF)、情感职能(RE)和精神健康(MH)这6个维度评分高于常模(P<0.05)。与深圳常模比较,生理职能(RP)、躯体疼痛(BP)、活力(VT)、社会功能(SF)这四个维度评分低于常模(P<0.05)。与四川常模比较,年龄性别人群分组中,情感职能(RE)维度评分均高于常模(P<0.05),活力(VT)维度评分均低于常模(P<0.05)。结论该县农村老年人生活质量有所提高,但相比部分发达地区仍有欠佳。应继续推进精准扶贫,提升农民收入,提高农村医疗服务水平和农民健康意识,丰富农民业余生活对稳步提升农村居民生活质量有较大意义。 Objective To understand the quality of life and medical status of residents in rural areas of a County.Methods By using the method of random cluster sampling,a real-name questionnaire survey was conducted among residents by using SF-36 and self-made scale.Results The Cronbach’s α coefficient and KMO value of SF-36 scale were>0.8 and 0.6 respectively.Comparing the scores of the rural elderly in Fengqiu county with those of the rural elderly in Henan Province,the score of vitality(VT)was lower than that of the norm,while the scores of physiological function(PF),body pain(BP),overall health status(GH),social function(SF),emotional function(RE)and mental health(MH)were higher than those of the norm.Compared with the Shenzhen norm,the scores of physiological function(RP),body pain(BP),vitality(VT)and social function(SF)were lower than those of the norm.Compared with the norm of Sichuan Province,the score of emotional function(RE)dimension of the four age and gender groups was higher than that of the norm,and the score of vitality(VT)dimension was lower than that of the norm(P<0.05).Conclusion The quality of life of the elderly in rural areas of the studied county has been improved,but it is still poor compared with some developed areas.It is necessary to arrange work reasonably according to the factors affecting the quality of life of the elderly in the county.
作者 梁冰 邵祎倩 任敬 邵美琪 朱康锋 张金胜 LIANG Bing;SHAO Yiqian;REN Jing;SHAO Meiqi;ZHU Kangfeng;ZHANG Jinsheng(The second clinical college,Xinxiang Medical University,Xinxiang 453000,China)
出处 《河南预防医学杂志》 2021年第1期36-38,共3页 Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 农村居民 生活质量 SF-36量表 Rural residents Quality of life SF-36 scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献64

  • 1于普林,吴雅凤,赵兵利,郑国珍,宋晓光,张培兰,何慧德.老年离退休职工生活质量调查分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,1996,15(6):370-371. 被引量:40
  • 2国家统计局人口与就业司.中国人口统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1997.4-6.
  • 3古模发,杜玉忠,陈新林,黎建军,张华满,钟健波.鼻咽癌患者中SF-36量表的信度和效度的研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(18):1403-1405. 被引量:29
  • 4Ware JE. SF - 36 Health Survey. Marmual and Interpretation Guide. Boston. MA: The Health Institute, 1993 .
  • 5Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF - 36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998 , 51 (11) : 1149 -1158.
  • 6Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF - 36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Elaidemiol, 1998, 51 (11): 903- 912.
  • 7Sanson - Fisher RW, Perkins JJ. Adaptation and validation of the SF- 36 Health Survey for use in Australia. J Clin Epidemiol,1998, 51 (11): 961-967.
  • 8Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF- 36 Health Survey - - I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden.Soc Sci Med. 1995, 41 (10): 349-358.
  • 9Shmueli A. The SF - 36 profde and health - related quality of life :an interpretative analysis. Qual Life Res, 1998, 7 (3): 187-195.
  • 10Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.

共引文献2659

同被引文献175

引证文献15

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部