期刊文献+

费曼式学习法干预模式改善终末期肾脏疾病患者健康素养及生活质量的研究 被引量:3

Research of Feynman′s Learning Method Intervention Model to Improve the Health Quality and Life Quality of Patients with End-stage Renal Disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨费曼式学习法对提高终末期肾脏疾病(end-stage renal disease,ESRD)患者健康素养水平及生活质量的临床价值。方法选取本科室2018-01/2019-01月在作者科室规律随访的184例ESRD患者,随机分成研究组和对照组,每组各92例。研究组采用在常规护理的基础上融入费曼式学习法为框架制定的护理干预模式,对照组采用常规护理,比较两组患者健康素养水平、自我管理行为及生活质量。结果干预前两组患者的健康素养水平、自我管理行为及生活质量评分无统计学差异(P>0.05);入组后12个月,费曼式学习组的信息获取能力评分(t=-2.052,P=0.042)、沟通与互动能力评分(t=-2.386,P=0.018)、改善健康意愿评分(t=-2.637,P=0.009)、经济支持意愿(t=-4.631,P<0.001)及总体(t=-5.104,P<0.001)均高于对照组;入组后12个月研究组的慢性肾脏病自我管理量表(chronic kidney disease self-efficacy,CKD-SE)评分中自主性(t=-3.367,P=0.001)、自我调节(t=-3.390,P=0.001)、寻求社会支持(t=-2.064,P=0.040)和总体(t=-4.137,P<0.001)均高于对照组;入组后12个月研究组生存质量量表(36 item short from health survey,SF-36)评分躯体功能(t=-4.207,P<0.001)、角色限制(t=-4.692,P<0.001)、躯体不适(t=-2.532,P=0.017)、健康总体自评(t=-2.921,P=0.023)分值均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论基于费曼式学习法的护理干预模式能提高ESRD患者的健康素养水平、自我管理行为及生活质量,有一定临床价值。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of Feynman′s learning method in improving the health literacy level and quality of life of patients with end stage renal disease(ESRD).Methods A total of 184 patients with ESRD who were regularly followed up in authors′center from January 2018 to January 2019 in the undergraduate room were selected and randomly divided into two groups,there were 92 patients in control group and 92 in study group,and the Study group adopted Feynman′s learning method as the framework of nursing intervention model based on routine nursing.Routine nursing were received by the control group.Then,the level of health literacy,self-behavior management and quality of life of patients in those two groups were compared.Results Before the intervention,there was no significant difference in the health literacy,self-management behavior and quality of life between the two groups of patients(P>0.05).Twelve months after enrollment,the Feynman learning group′s score of information acquisition ability(t=-2.052,P=0.042),score of communication and interaction ability(t=-2.386,P=0.018),willingness to improve health(t=-2.637,P=0.009),willingness of financial support(t=-4.631,P<0.001)and overall(t=-5.104,P<0.001)were higher than those of the control group.The chronic kidney disease self-efficacy(CKD-SE)scores of the study group at 12 months after enrollment included autonomy(t=-3.367,P=0.001),self-regulation(t=-3.390,P=0.001),seeking social support(t=-2.064,P=0.040)and overall(t=-4.137,P<0.001)were all higher than those of the control group.Twelve months after enrollment,the study group′s 36 item short from health survey(SF-36)physical functioning(t=-4.207,P<0.001),role physical(t=-4.692,P<0.001),bodily pain(t=-2.532,P=0.017),general health(t=-2.921,P=0.023)were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The nursing intervention model based on Feynman′s learning method can improve the level of health literacy,self-management behavior and quality of life of patients with ESRD,which has certain clinical value.
作者 邓小容 李萍 李雪 李芮 蔡明玉 DENG Xiaorong;LI Ping;LI Xue;LI Rui;CAI Mingyu(Department of Nephrology,Daping Hospital Army Medical University,Chongqing400042,China)
出处 《华南国防医学杂志》 CAS 2021年第5期334-337,343,共5页 Military Medical Journal of South China
基金 重庆市技术创新与应用示范应用研究(cstc2018jscx-msybX0093)
关键词 终末期肾脏疾病 费曼式学习法 健康素养水平 自我管理 生活质量 End-stage renal disease Feynman′s learning method Level of health literacy Self-management Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献37

  • 1Eckardt KU,Kasiske BL.Kidney disease:improving global outcomes.Nat Rev Nephrol,2009,5(11):650 -657.
  • 2Uhlig K,Macleod A,Craig J,et al.Grading evidence and recommendations for clinical practice guidelines in nephrology.A position statement from Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).Kidney Int,2006,70:2058-2065.
  • 3Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD work Group.KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis,evaluation,prevention,and treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD).Kidney Int,2009,113 (Suppl):S1-S130.
  • 4Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group.KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients.Am J Transplant,2009,9 (Suppl 3):S1-155.
  • 5Moe S,Drüeke T,Cunningham J,et al.Definition,evaluation,and classification of renal osteodystrophy:a position statement from Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).Kidney Int,2006,69:1945-1953.
  • 6Abbud-Filho M,Adams PL,Alberú J,et al.A report of the Lisbon Conference on the care of the kidney transplant recipient.Transplantation,2007,83(8 Suppl):S1-S22.
  • 7Locatelli F,Nissenson AR,Barrett BJ,et al.Clinical practice guidelines for anemia in chronic kidney disease:problems and solutions.A position statement from Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).Kidney Int,2008,74:1237-1240.
  • 8Levey AS,Eckardt KU,Tsukamoto Y,et al.Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease:a position statementfrom Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).Kidney Int,2005,67:2089-2100.
  • 9Levey AS,Atkins R,Coresh J,et al.Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem:approaches and initiatives-a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes.Kidney Int,2007,72:247-259.
  • 10Eckardt KU,Berns JS,Rocco MV,et al.Definition and classification of CKD:the debate should be about patient prognosis-a position statement from KDOQI and KDIGO.Am J Kidney Dis,2009,53:915 -920.

共引文献178

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部