刺络放血联合中药足浴治疗急性发热的临床效果

目的:分析刺络放血联合中药足浴治疗急性发热的临床效果。方法:以我院2021年7月-2023年3月内收治的80例急性发热患者为本次研究对象,并以随机数字法分为常规组(40例,常规治疗)和观察组(40例,刺络放血联合中药足浴治疗),对比分析两组患者的治疗有效率、治疗后不同时间段的体温数值及治疗前后的炎症指标。结果:(1)观察组患者的治疗有效率显著高于常规组(P<0.05);(2)两组患者治疗后0.5h的体温数值无统计学差异(P>0.05),而观察组患者治疗后2h、12h等时间段的体温数值显著低于常规组(P<0.05);(3)两组患者治疗前的炎症指标均无对比差异(P>0.05),但治疗后的观察组患者炎症指标均显著低于常规组(P<0.05)。结论:以刺络放血联合中药足浴治疗急性发热,可取得理想治疗效果。

Objective:To analyze the clinical effect of pricking collaterals and bloodletting combined with traditional Chinese medicine foot bath in the treatment of acute fever.Method:80 patients with acute fever admitted to our hospital from July 2021 to March 2023 were selected as the study subjects.They were randomly divided into a conventional group(40 cases,conventional treatment)and an observation group(40 cases,acupuncture and bloodletting combined with traditional Chinese medicine foot bath treatment).The treatment efficacy,body temperature values at different time periods after treatment,and inflammatory indicators before and after treatment were compared and analyzed between the two groups.Result:(1)The treatment effectiveness rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group(P<0.05);(2)There was no statistically significant difference in the body temperature values between the two groups of patients at 0.5 hours after treatment(P>0.05),while the body temperature values of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the conventional group at 2 and 12 hours after treatment(P<0.05);(3)There was no significant difference in the inflammatory indicators between the two groups of patients before treatment(P>0.05),but the inflammatory indicators in the observation group after treatment were significantly lower than those in the conventional group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combination of pricking blood and traditional Chinese medicine foot bath can achieve ideal therapeutic effects in the treatment of acute fever.