期刊文献+

高考科目“选择性”改革的实践挑战与前景思考

On Motive and Challenges Faced by“Option”Reform for Gaokao
原文传递
导出
摘要 “选择性”是高考改革的历史性问题,也是改革的未来走向。本轮高考改革围绕增加高校与学生的双重选择空间,对考试科目、赋分方式和录取方式进行了综合性改革。尽管高考的“选择性”改革取向契合学生发展、高校人才培养的新趋势,旨在撬动基础教育和高等教育的双重变革;然而在实践中,诸如自由选科机制不完善、专业设置权的虚置、生源的结构性矛盾、选科行为的集体非理性等问题不断涌现,高考改革受到巨大挑战。针对这些挑战,研究认为高考改革需要坚持选择性导向不动摇,在改革实践中合理推进中学教育教学改革,强化主体间的协作;高校勇担改革使命,优化专业结构,完善人才培养体系;继续探究科学的赋分制度,发挥高校的引领作用。 “Option”has been a problem to be solved,therefore,a goal for future reform.Currently,the new gaokao reform,aiming to offer more options for both the universities and the candidates,begins to carry out a comprehensive reform in the aspects like subjects of examination,ways of grading,and policies of admission,etc.The reform focuses on offering more options and devotes attention to both the fundamental and higher education,so it is in line with the new trend of student development and talent cultivation in colleges.However,the practice of the option reform has witnessed the emergence of the problems such as defective mechanism of free selection of subjects,void rights of specialty setting by the universities,structural difficulties in admitting candidates,and students’irrational behavior of subject-selecting by the,etc.To fight against the above-mentioned problems,this article holds that the selective orientation of gaokao reform should be sticked to,and meanwhile in the practice,we need to promote the education reform in senior high schools and as well as the cooperation between senior high schools and colleges.What’s more,colleges are supposed to undertake the mission of reform,and actively optimize the professional structure so as to improve the talent training system.And it’s also crucial for the colleges to explore the scientific scoring system and give full play to their own’s leading roles.
作者 方芳 Fang Fang(Institution of Education,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian 361005,China)
出处 《湖北招生考试》 2022年第3期36-42,共7页 Enrollment and Examination in Hubei
关键词 选择性 高考改革 现实挑战 options gaokao reform practical challenges
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献70

  • 1[美]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包刚,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
  • 2罗冠中.(2012).考生群体能力指数及其在香港中学文凭考试中的应用.第六届四市一区教育考试机构院长(秘书长)联席会议.天津.
  • 3香港教育统筹委员会.(2000).终身学习全人发展-香港教育制度改革建议.香港:教育统筹委员会.
  • 4香港教育统筹局.(2005).高中及高等教育新学制-投资香港未来的行动方案.香港:教育统筹局.
  • 5香港考试及评核局.(2011). Grading Procedures and Standards-referenced Reporting in the HKDSE Examination.香港:考试及评核局.
  • 6香港考试及评核局.(2011a) . Moderation of School - based As-sessment Scores in the HKDSE.香港:考试及评核局.
  • 7Luo,G. (2005) . The relationship between the Rating Scale andPartial Credit Model and the implication of disordered thresh-olds of the Rasch model for polytomous responses. Journal ofApplied Measurement,6(4) ,443 -455.
  • 8Luo,G.,& Andrich,D. (2005) _ Estimating parameters in theRasch model in the presence of null categories. Journal of Ap-plied Measurement,6(2) ,128 - 146.
  • 9顾明远.因材施教与教育公平[J].现代大学教育,2007,23(6):1-3. 被引量:51
  • 10秦春华.我对浙江高考改革方案的忧虑[N].中国青年报,2015-02-02.

共引文献268

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部