期刊文献+

英国家事诉讼中脆弱人员出庭制度及借鉴 被引量:1

Vulnerable Persons System of Family Proceedings in England & Wales and Reference to China
原文传递
导出
摘要 英国家事诉讼中重视脆弱人员的福利保障,为帮助未成年人、残疾人、家庭暴力受害人等脆弱人员有效参与家事诉讼,规定了脆弱人员出庭制度,既保护了脆弱人员不受伤害,又有利于查清事实公正审判。在贯彻“当事人亲自到庭”和“人性化”家事审判理念的背景之下,我国可在现有立法和司法的基础上借鉴英国经验,规定未成年人、家庭暴力受害人等脆弱人员可通过不被看见、视听传输技术、他人陪同等特殊方式出庭制度,必要时采取分别庭审或书面质证方式审理家庭暴力案件。未成年人作证的,应当考虑出庭的必要性及其出庭意愿。对英国家事诉讼中脆弱人员出庭制度的参考借鉴,将有利于保障家事诉讼中弱势群体的程序参与利益,为我国“家事诉讼法”的独立立法提供宝贵经验。 England&Wales values the welfare of vulnerable persons in family proceedings.In order to help vulnerable persons such as children,the disabled and victims of domestic violence to participate in family proceedings effectively,England&Wales has established the vulnerable persons system,by which it protects the vulnerable persons from harm and is beneficial to accurate fact-findings and fair trial.In the context of implementing the concepts of“parties attend courts in person”and“humanized trial”in family trials,China can learn the experiences from England&Wales on the basis of the existing judicial practice,and stipulate that,children,victims of domestic violence and other vulnerable persons can attend in court by special ways such as not being seen,video link,supporter,etc.If necessary,the court can let the parties attend separate hearings or cross-examine the evidence in written to hear domestic violence cases.And if a child gives evidence,the court shall consider the necessity of attending in person and the child’s will.The reference will be conducive to protect the interests of vulnerable persons in family proceedings,and provide valuable experience for the independent legislation of Family Procedure Rules in China.
作者 张艳丽 李亚楠 ZHANG Yan-li;LI Ya-nan(School of Law,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期60-76,共17页 Hebei Law Science
基金 北京市社会科学基金重点项目“北京市基层法院家事审判机制改革研究”(17FXA001) 国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(留金选[2020]101号)的阶段性成果
关键词 家事诉讼 脆弱人员 弱势群体 出庭制度 程序参与 family proceedings vulnerable person vulnerable group attend in court procedural participation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献75

  • 1李浩.论法院调解中程序法与实体法约束的双重软化──兼析民事诉讼中偏重调解与严肃执法的矛盾[J].法学评论,1996,14(4):11-16. 被引量:83
  • 2魏大喨.家事诉讼与非讼之集中交错—以对审权与裁量权为中心[J].月旦法学杂志,2003,(3).
  • 3邱联恭.诉讼法理与非讼法理之交错适用[A].民事诉讼法之研讨·二[C].三民书局.
  • 4邱璿如.“家事事件审理程序之新建构(下)”[J].台湾本土法学杂志,2002,(10).
  • 5Mandy Burton,Roger Evans&Andrew Sanders,Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses and the Adversarial Process in England and Wales,11(1)The International Journal of Evidence and Proof 1,1(2007).
  • 6Office for Criminal Justice Reform(UK),Convicting Rapists and Protecting Victims-Justice for Victims of Rape:A Consultation Paper 33(2006).
  • 7R.v.Buckingham,O.J.No.3546(C.Jus.)(2009).
  • 8Van Mechelen,25 E.H.R.R.647,at§58-60.
  • 9Louise Ellison&Jacqueline Wheatcroft,Exploring the Influence of Courtroom Questioning and Pre-trial Preparation on Adult Witness Accuracy 38(University of Leeds:Arts&Humanities Research Council 2010).
  • 10R.v.Levogiannis,4 S.C.R.475,483,484(1993).

共引文献34

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部