纵向垄断协议的反垄断法规制路径探析——以强生公司被诉垄断案为例

On the Regulation of Vertical Agreement by Anti-monopoly Law——At the case perspective of Johnson & Johnson( China) Group Ltd which was sued against Anti-monopoly Law

《反垄断法》第14条规定的纵向垄断协议,司法解释应明确由经营者承担证明协议是否具有排斥或限制竞争效果的举证责任;纵向垄断协议的违法认定的实质是区分该协议的横向垄断协议、滥用市场支配地位、不公正交易行为或不正当竞争行为性质;《反垄断法》规制纵向垄断协议立法应设置三种规制路径,即按横向垄断协议处理、按滥用市场支配地位处理、按不正当竞争或不公正交易行为处理;《反垄断法》应当立法规制不公正交易行为。

Section fourteen of Anti-monopoly Law of China refer to the regulation of vertical agreement,the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation should stipulates the burden responsibility of undertakings to prove its effect of excluding or restricting competition.The essence of regulation of vertical agreement is to decide the agreement’s effect of horizontal agreement or abuse of dominant position or unfair trade practice or other acts.Anti-monopoly Law of China should treat vertical agreements as three routes of horizontal agreement,abuse of dominant position,unfair trade practice.Anti-monopoly Law of China should regulate unfair trade practice.