容留他人吸毒罪的过度扩张与限制认定

The Overexpansion and Restriction on the Crime of Providing a Venue for Drug Users

近年容留他人吸毒罪的司法适用呈现过度扩张的问题。以不作为构成容留他人吸毒罪的情形应当受到严格限定。作为义务的认定需要考察义务类型与义务强度,无法仅由行为人对场所的支配、控制能力产生。立足于此,针对实践中未制止他人吸食毒品,但属以下情形之一的,不应认定或尽可能排除不作为犯的成立:行为人与吸毒人员共同使用某一场所的;共同居住的一方吸食或容留他人吸食毒品的;非特定场所经营者、管理者发现他人在其经营、管理场所内吸食毒品的;经营性场所从事一般性劳务的人员发现他人吸食毒品的;同时存在法定义务主体的。

In recent years,the judicial application of the crime of providing a venue for drug users has been over-expanded.The circumstances under which omission constitutes the crime should be strictly limited.The identification of an obligation needs to be examined by type and intensity,and it cannot be identified only by the actor’s ability to dominate and control the place.Thus,for those who have not stopped others from taking drugs in practice,but fall into one of the following circumstances,omission should not be determined or excluded as far as possible:the perpetrator and the drug addict share certain places together;and the perpetrator share the residence with peoplewho use drugs or allow others to take drugs;non-specified place operators and managers discover that others are taking drugs in their premises;personnel engaged in general labor services in business premises discover that others are taking drugs;at the same time there is a subject of legal obligation.