窃取虚拟物品行为定性问题研究

Qualitative Study on the Act of Stealing Virtual Objects

在物权说的解释路径下虚拟物品未发生占有转移,被害人没有财产损失,债权说的解释路径受到法秩序同一原理的限制,特征归入法在方法和具体特征论证上均存在问题,因此窃取虚拟物品不构成财产犯罪。破坏计算机信息系统罪第2款包括系统安全要素,窃取虚拟物品不会影响系统安全运行;只有侵入方式获取数据才可能构成非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪。窃取虚拟物品不构成犯罪。有罪论是以处罚必要性扩张处罚范围的实质解释,但实际上作为前提的处罚必要性不存在,扩张的后果也有处罚不协调的妥当性问题。

The virtual object do not transfer possession and the victim has no property loss under the interpretation path of the right in rem theory,the interpretation path of the claim theory is limited by the uniform theory of legal order,and the characteristic subsumption method has problems in both the method and the specific characteristic argument,so the theft of virtual object does not constitute a property crime.The second section of the crime of damaging computer information system includes the component of system security,and stealing virtual object will not affect the safe operation of the system;only using intrusion may constitute the crime of illegally obtaining computer information system data.Stealing virtual object does not constitute a crime,and the theory of guilt is a substantive interpretation that expands the scope of punishment by the necessity of punishment,but in practice there is no necessity of punishment as a prerequisite,the consequences of the expansion also has the problems of the appropriateness of the incompatibility of punishment.