受虐妇女杀夫案中的出罪路径研究

Study of the Decriminalization in“Battered Woman Kill Her Husband”

有关受虐妇女杀夫案,紧急避险说、期待可能说、责任能力阻却说均认为,行为人面对的是一种侵害行为随时可能发生的危险状态。对此危险状态,依据我国有关正当防卫的最新司法解释,不法侵害的开始已经不再等同于侵害行为的着手,而是以是否存在现实紧迫的危险为标准。因此,即使家庭暴力行为尚未发生,只要受虐妇女面临的危险达到了现实紧迫的程度,其反击行为就应当被认定为防卫行为。在具体的危险判断中,应当充分考虑曾经发生过的家庭暴力的情况,并从正当防卫合法化依据出发,更加偏向受虐者法益的保护。

About the the case of“Battered Woman Kill Her Husband”,the theory of necessity,probability of expectation and excuse recognize that the perpetrator is facing a dangerous state in which criminal act may occur at any time.For this dangerous state,according to the latest judicial interpretation of self-defense,the beginning of offence is no longer equal to criminal act,but based on whether there is a realistic and urgent danger.Therefore,even if domestic violence has not occurred yet,as long as the risk faced by battered women reaches the degree of realistic and urgent,their counterattack should be recognized as self-defence.In the specific risk judgment,full consideration should be given to cases of domestic violence that have occurred,and according to the basis of the legalization of justifiable defense,it is more biased towards the protection of the victims’legal interests.