摘要
不作为共犯是共犯论与行为论的交叉地带,同时涉及这两个领域,并且具有一定的复杂性。从刑法教义学进行分析,作为可以构成共犯,不作为也可以构成共犯。然而,不作为共犯又可以进一步区分为纯正的不作为共犯与不纯正的不作为共犯。因此,在对不作为共犯进行考察时,应当同时采用共犯论与行为论的分析方法。不作为共犯不仅是一个刑法理论问题,同时也是一个司法实践中的疑难问题。司法机关处理不作为共犯案件的时候,对此种案件的定性往往存在较大的意见分歧。因此,从刑法理论的角度来说,应当对不作为共犯的规则进行归纳与提炼,并且对所涉及的疑难问题进行教义学的判断。只有这样,才能从理论与实践两个层面总结不作为共犯的规则与教义。
Omission accomplice is the intersection of accomplice theory and behavior theory.It involves these two fields at the same time,and has certain complexity.From the criminal law dogmatics analysis,act can constitute accomplice,and omission can also constitute accomplice.However,omission accomplice can be further divided into pure omission accomplice and impure omission accomplice.Therefore,the analysis methods of accomplice theory and behavior theory should be adopted at the same time when researching the omission accomplice.Omission accomplice is not only a theoretical problem in criminal law,but also a difficult problem in judicial practice.When the judicial organs deal with the cases of omission accomplice,there are different opinions on the nature of such cases.Therefore,from the perspective of criminal law theory,we should summarize and refine the rules of omission accomplice,and judge the difficult issues involved in dogmatics.Only in this way can we summarize the rules and doctrines of omission accomplice from the theory and practice.
出处
《法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期72-84,共13页
Law Science