摘要
我国反腐败斗争取得压倒性胜利,但形势依然严峻复杂。以《联合国反腐败公约》为基础,通过劝返和域外追诉等方式,使很多外逃腐败分子回国接受审判,追缴回了很多赃款。然而我国现阶段适用这两种方式进行反腐败追逃追赃工作时,面临缺乏强力的法律支撑和顺畅的国际合作等难题。我国应当在相关法律,特别是《刑事诉讼法》《监察法》中认可“恢复性司法”的理念和模式,充分利用劝返模式的优势,减少域外追诉的负担。此外,在法律制度层面认可恢复性司法,可增进世界其他国家对我国反腐败法律制度的了解,增强我国在反腐败国际合作中的话语权。
There have been many inspiring achievements made since the anti-corruption work initiated in China.Based on the UN Convention against Corruption,dozens of fugitives have been caught,and a host of assets in relation to corruption recovered through persuasion to return and extraterritorial prosecution.However,these two approaches in the anti-corruption work have to face serious issues,especially the lack of strong legal basis and the unhindered international cooperation.This study believes that the idea and the mode of restorative justice shall be acknowledged in relevant laws,inter alia,the Criminal Procedural Code and the Law of Supervision.By doing so,it makes the better use of the approach of persuasion to return in China’s current legal framework,and decreases the legal burden in implementing the exterritorial prosecution.Furthermore,to recognise restorative justice as legitimate in the anti-corruption campaigns is able to improve the understanding of other countries to China’s law and legal system,and strengthen China’s power in anti-corruption international cooperation discourse.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期159-172,共14页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
追逃追赃
国际合作
恢复性司法
anti-corruption on fugitive repatriation and asset recovery
persuasion to return
extraterritorial prosecution
restorative justice