期刊文献+

监察检察主体互涉案件管辖问题检视 被引量:6

The Jurisdictional Problems of Subjects Involvement Cases between the Supervisory Committee and the Procuratorate
原文传递
导出
摘要 监察检察主体互涉案件是指案件虽然分属监察机关和检察机关管辖,但由于存在人员方面的牵连性,因此需要二机关之间进行衔接协作的案件类型。根据规定,此类案件既可以由监察机关进行并案管辖,也可以由二机关进行分案管辖,这是符合职权原则要求的。对于主体互涉叠加事实互涉的案件,更适宜采取并案管辖的做法。对于单纯的主体互涉案件,除非涉嫌多种违法犯罪的行为主体可能面临限制人身自由措施的适用,否则更适宜采取分案管辖的做法。在分案模式下,监察机关和检察机关应当依法奉行监察主导原则,此时监察机关"主调查"主要针对的是案件整体流程的把控和具体措施的优先适用。 Subjects involvement cases between the supervisory committee and the procuratorate refer to the types of cases that require coordination and cooperation between the two organs due to the involvement of subjects,although the cases are under the jurisdiction of the supervisory committee and procuratorate respectively.According to the legislation,such cases can be under the jurisdiction of both the supervisory committee and two organs,which is in line with the requirements of the principle of authority.For the subject and fact involvement cases,it is more suitable to adopt the approach of combining the jurisdiction of the case.However,for the only subject involvement cases,it is more suitable to take the case by case,unless the subject may face the application of the restriction of personal freedom.Under the case splitting mode,supervisory committees and procuratorate should follow the principle of supervision leading according to law.At this time,"the main investigation"of the supervisory committee is mainly aimed at the control of the overall process and the priority application of specific measures.
作者 林艺芳 Lin Yifang
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期110-118,共9页 Law Science Magazine
基金 2018年湖南省哲学社会科学基金一般项目“职务犯罪案件监察公安配合衔接机制研究”(项目编号:18YBA415)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 监察机关 检察机关 主体互涉 事实互涉 职务违法犯罪 the supervisory committee the procuratorate subject involvement fact involvement illegal and criminal corruption
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1尚武.全力以赴开展打黑除恶专项斗争[J].中国刑事警察,2006(3):26-28. 被引量:1
  • 2朱孝清.中国检察制度的几个问题[J].中国法学,2007(2):108-131. 被引量:225
  • 3王德光.我国刑事侦查管辖权制度的立法缺陷及完善[J].中国刑事法杂志,2007(4):81-86. 被引量:13
  • 4Stanley Z. Fisher. Prosecutor's Ethical Duty to Seek Exculpatory Evidence in Police Hands: Lessons from England [J] . Fordham L. Rev, 1999-2000 (6S) .
  • 5[法]贝尔纳·布洛克.法国刑事诉讼法精义[M].罗结珍,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2009:345.
  • 6Changwon Pyo, Prosecutor. Police and Criminal Investigation in Korea: A Critical Review [J] . Journal of Korean Law, 2007, 6 (2) .
  • 7顾昂然.《中华人民共和国刑法》《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》讲话[M].北京:法律出版社,1997:45—46.
  • 8[法]爱曼克·马蒂尔斯.论欧洲五国警察机关与检察机关的关系[M]//诉讼法学研究(Vol.5).北京:中国检察出版社,2003:453.
  • 9Mireille Delmas - Marty and J. R. Spencer. European criminal procedures [ M ]. Cambrige : Cambrige University Press, 2002 : 479.
  • 10顾昂然.《关于<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法修正案(草案)>的说明》.

共引文献133

同被引文献137

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部