期刊文献+

建构与宪法相融的经济法——兼论政府与市场经济的关系 被引量:3

Constructing an Economic Law That Conforms with Constitution
原文传递
导出
摘要 经济法兼顾私权和公益、市场和政府的特性决定了必然要打破已经固化的法律二元体系,否则将与公法和私法形成冲突,甚至出现违宪后果。无论是镀金时代和新政时期的美国,还是改革开放中的中国,这种冲突都有不同程度的表现。对公民财产权利保护不力,缺乏公平保护公民从事经济活动的制度,将计划经济体制宪法化以及税收权的宪法缺位等是改革开放过程中我国经济法与宪法不协调的主要原因。但经济法自始至终都是宪法价值观的追捧者,是宪法最忠实的跟随者和践行者。鉴于在个人与社会、权利与权力等基本关系方面的已有共识,中国经济法不仅能避免违宪,而且完全能与宪法相融。 The characteristics of the economic law that takes into account the relationship between private rights and public welfare,the market and the government,determine that it is necessary to break the already established legal dual system,and it forms conflicts with public law and private law and form a constitutional crisis.Whether it is the United States in the gold-plated and New Deal eras,or China in the reform and opening up,such conflicts have varying degrees of performance,and the reasons are different.The main reasons for the inconsistency between China’s economic law and the constitution in the process of reform and opening up are the lack of protection of citizens’property rights,the lack of fair protection of citizens’right to engage in economic activities,the constitutionalizing of the planned economic system and the lack of constitutional power of taxation.But economic law is the enthusiast for constitutional values from beginning to end and is the most faithful follower and practitioner of the Constitution.Based on the consensus on the basic relationship between individuals and society,rights and power,China’s economic law can not only avoid unconstitutionality,but also fully integrate with the Constitution.
作者 薛克鹏 Xue Kepeng(不详)
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期89-98,共10页 Law Science Magazine
关键词 经济法 宪法 合宪性危机 个人权利 社会公共利益 economic law constitution constitutional crisis individual rights social public interest
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Lochner v. New York,198 U.S.45 (1905).
  • 2198 U.S.65.
  • 3http://www.anwers.com/topic/lochner-v-Dew-york,访问时间:2013年12月20日.
  • 4165 U.S.589.
  • 5付瑶:《契约自由的宪法保护-以美国宪法史上的“洛克纳时代”(1897-1937年)为中心》,中国政法大学出版社2012年第1版,31页.
  • 6Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366(1898).
  • 7Atldn v. Kansas, 191 U.S. 207 (1903).
  • 8Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908).
  • 9Adkins v. Children' s Hospital, 261U. S. 525 (1923).
  • 10伯纳德·施瓦兹《美国法律史》,2011年8、月第2版,第96页.

共引文献196

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部