期刊文献+

定量DCE-MRI对乳腺非肿块型强化病变良恶性的预测价值 被引量:14

Differentiation between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement lesions using volumetric quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨定量动态对比增强MRI(qDCE-MRI)对乳腺非肿块型强化病变(NME)良恶性的预测价值。方法:回顾性收集83例行乳腺常规MR增强及DCE-MRI检查、术后病理资料完整的乳腺NME病变患者,对病变感兴趣区(ROI)进行三维分割,获得qDCE-MRI定量及半定量参数。定量参数包括容量转移常数(Ktrans)、速率常数(Kep)、血管外细胞外间隙容积比(Ve)、血管(血浆)间隙容积分数(Vp);半定量参数包括达峰时间(TTP)、最大浓度(Max Con)、浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)、最大斜率(Max Slope)。采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验分析NME良恶性病变间的统计学差异;采用单因素回归分析各参数的独立诊断效能,并用多因素回归分析最终诊断方程;绘制ROC曲线评估qDCE-MRI参数对NME病变良恶性的鉴别诊断效能。结果:NME病变良、恶性组的Ktrans值分别为(0.0563±0.042)和(0.1092±0.0550)min-1,两者差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001);Kep值分别为(0.4334±0.2516)和(0.6863±0.3039)min-1,两者差异具有统计学意义(P=0.001);Vp值分别为(0.0046±0.0063)和(0.0106±0.0092),两者差异具有统计学意义(P=0.012);TTP值分别为(4.4499±0.7441)和(3.7880±0.7571)min,两者差异具有统计学意义(P=0.001);Max Slope值分别为(0.2021±0.1084)和(0.3067±0.1178),两者差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。单因素回归分析得出Ktrans、Kep、Vp、TTP、Max Slope对于NME良恶性均具有独立诊断效能,其中以Ktrans的诊断效能最高,AUC为0.790(95%CI:0.675~0.906,P<0.05);多因素回归分析后,Ktrans及TTP进入最终方程,最终方程对于NME良恶性鉴别的AUC为0.831(95%CI:0.727~0.935,P<0.05)。结论:qDCE-MRI对乳腺NME病变良恶性具有一定的鉴别诊断价值。 Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of volumetric quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI(qDCE-MRI)in the differentiation between malignant and benign non-mass enhancement(NME)lesions.Methods:The clinicopathological data of 82 NME patients were retrospectively analyzed.All patients underwent MRI enhanced and DCE-MRI scans before treatment.3 D-ROI was drawn on the NME lesions.Quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans,Kep,Ve,Vp semi-quantitative parameters TTP,Max Con,Max Slope,AUC were obtained by using a two-compartment extended Tofts model.Comparisons between groups were respectively analyzed using the t test or Mann-Whitney U test.Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of malignancy,followed by receiver operating characteristics(ROC)analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance.Results:Ktrans values were(0.0563±0.042)min-1 and(0.1092±0.0550)min-1 in malignant and benign NME groups,respectively,with statistically significant difference(P<0.001).Kep values were(0.4334±0.2516)min-1 and(0.6863±0.3039)min-1,respectively,with statistically significant difference(P=0.001).Vp values were(0.0046±0.0063)and(0.0106±0.0092),respectively,with statistically significant difference(P=0.012).TTP values were(4.4499±0.7441)min and(3.7880±0.7571)min,respectively,with statistically significant difference(P=0.001).The Max Slope values were(0.2021±0.1084)and(0.3067±0.1178),respectively,with statistically significant difference(P<0.001).Ktrans provided the highest accuracy of 0.790(95%CI:0.675~0.906,P<0.05).Univariate regression analysis showed that Ktrans,Kep,Vp,TTP and Max Slope were independent predictors and Ktrans has the highest diagnostic performance.Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that Ktrans and TTP were independent predictors of malignancy and the area under ROC curve was 0.831(95%CI:0.717~0.935,P<0.05).Conclusion:qDCE-MRI has a certain value in differential diagnosis of breast non-mass enhancement lesions.
作者 宋超 朱望舒 石思雅 石广滋 程子亮 曾伟科 吴卓 SONG Chao;ZHU Wang-shu;SHI Si-ya(Department of Radiology,Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,China)
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2020年第2期190-196,共7页 Radiologic Practice
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1309100) 国家自然科学基金(81671653).
关键词 乳腺非肿块强化病变 磁共振成像 动态对比增强MRI Breast non-mass enhancement lesion Magnetic resonance imaging Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献53

  • 1中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2011版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(5):367-417. 被引量:264
  • 2Kocaoglu M,Somuncu I,Ors F,et al.Imaging findings in idio-pathic granulomatous mastitis.A review with emphasis on mag-netic resonance imaging[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2004,28:635-641.
  • 3Morrow M,Waters J,Morris E. MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment[J]. Lancet,2011,378(9805) :1804-1811.
  • 4American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: Magnetic reso- nance imaging. In ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas[M]. Am College of Radiology, 2003:41-109.
  • 5李玉林,唐建武,文剑明,等.病理学(第六版)[M].人民卫生出版社,2007:70-71.
  • 6Diane M. Renz, Pascal A. t. Baltzer, Joachim B6ttcher, et al. Ma- gentle resonance imaging of inflammatory breast carcinoma and a- cute mastitis. A comparative study[J]. Eur J Radiology, 2008,18 (11) :2370-2380.
  • 7Takayoshi Uematsu. MRI findings of inflammatory breast cancer, locally advanced breast cancer, and acute mastitis: T2-weighted images can increase the specificity of inflammatory breast cancer [J]. Breast Cancer, 2012,19(4) :289-294.
  • 8Unal O,Koparan HI,Avcu S, et al. The diagnostic value of diffu- sion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in soft tissue abscesses [J]. Eur J Radiol,2011,77(3) ..490-494.
  • 9Ei Kbouli RH,Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3. 0T breast MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2010,256 (1) : 64-73.
  • 10Thomassin-Naggara I,De Bazelaire C, Chopier J, et al. Diffusion- weighted MR imaging of the breast: advantages and pitfalls[J]. Eur J Radiology, 2013,82 (3) .. 435-443.

共引文献160

同被引文献105

引证文献14

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部