摘要
网络游戏账号作为玩家对网络游戏运营商的物权权利与物权基本性质矛盾,作为债权性权利既切合通说也符合实践的要求。网络游戏账号交易不具备《民法典》第545条所规定的禁止转让的条件。运营商以保护隐私为由禁止交易,是在干涉玩家的隐私权,该理由不应被支持。出于鼓励交易的目的,法律应允许玩家可以自由地转让账号债权,规定运营商有保护网络游戏账号交易的义务。
Online game accounts conflict with the basic nature of property right.It is reasonable for them to act as creditor’s right and it is suitable for widely accepted viewpoints and practice.Therefore,the trade of online game account does not conform to the Article 545 of Civil Code.The operators cannot impinge on players’right of controlling privacy power by forbidding online game account trade.In order to encourage trade,players should be allowed to transfer the possession of game accounts freely,and operators have obligation to protect game account trade.
关键词
债权性权利
无效格式条款
隐私支配权
Creditor’s Rights
Invalid Standard Clauses
the Right of Controlling Privacy
