保护规范的援引与解释——“联立公司诉北京市东城区人民政府行政复议案”评析

References and Interpretations of Protection Norms——Analysis of the Administrative Reconsideration Case of Lianli Company v.Beijing Dongcheng District People's Government

“联立公司案”展现了保护规范理论司法适用技术的发展,将保护规范的援引扩充到程序规范、职责规范和制裁规范,对规范保护对象采取了实质化的解释方法,解释结论也以保障诉权为价值取向,充分考虑了规范实施效果和其他权益救济渠道的有效性。为了避免对本案裁定的示范意义产生误解,需要明确:保护规范理论中的第三人限于规范结构的受益对象;程序规范对实体法权益原则上仅具有指引和辅助解释的功能;该理论重在解决利益属性的规范评价问题,而被诉行政行为与利益侵害之间因果关系的确立,应是该理论适用的前提。

The Lianli company case shows the development of judicial applicable technology of protection norm theory,expands the invocation of protection norms to procedural norms,duty norms and sanctions norms,adopts a substantive interpretation method for the object of protection of norms,and takes the protection of litigation rights as the value orientation of the interpretation conclusion,fully considering the effectiveness of the implementation of the norms and the effectiveness of other rights and interests relief channels.In order to avoid misunderstanding the exemplary meaning of the ruling in this.case,it needs to be clarified that the protection of third parties in normative theory is limited to the beneficiaries of the normative structure;In principle,procedural norms only have the function of guiding and assisting interpretation of substantive law interests;this theory focuses on solving the normative evaluation of the nature of interests,and the establishment of the causal relationship between the administrative act being sued and the infringement of interests should be the premise for the application of the theory.