摘要
辩思解释与据法阐释间的紧张关系,已经深刻影响了当代中国法治思维方式的构建。在辩证思维之中,广泛的解释性语用,张扬了法律的弹性,使法律能以灵活多变、与时俱进的方式调整社会关系。然而,过度的辩思也会使法律失去独立性,危及法律的权威性和安定性,进而导致与法治中国建设相适应的思维方式难以形成。因而常用的法律解释话语及其方法,最好能被据法阐释或法律阐释所替代。法治话语需要显现对法律的虔诚;法治思维需要突出据法阐释的基础地位。重视据法阐释的意义,在于强调法律的安定性、体系性和权威性等对法治的意义,明确法律的规范功能。
The tension between dialectical interpretation and interpretation according to law has profoundly influenced the construction of the way of thinking about the rule of law in contemporary China.Among the dialectical thinking,the extensive interpretive discourse flaunts the flexibility of the law,enabling it to adjust social relations in a flexible and up-to-date manner.However,excessive dialectical thinking can also make the law lose its independence,endanger the authority and stability of the law,and thus make it difficult to form a way of thinking that is compatible with the construction of rule of law China.Thus,the commonly used legal interpretation discourse and its methods should preferably be replaced by law-based interpretation or legal interpretation.The rule of law discourse needs to show the devotion to law;the rule of law thinking needs to highlight the basic position of legal interpretation.The significance of legal interpretation is to emphasize the significance of the stability,systemic nature and authority of the law to the rule of law,and to clarify the normative function of the law.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期3-13,共11页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重大项目(18ZDA034)“新兴学科视野中的法律逻辑及其拓展研究”
关键词
据法阐释
辩思解释
法治思维方式
法律方法
法律推理
interpretation according to law
dialectical interpretation
rule of law thinking
legal method
legal reasoning