摘要
在自由主义的思想史上,自由主义经历了从旧自由主义向新自由主义的历史演进。新自由主义的产生与存在,既与资本主义演进到帝国主义阶段有着紧密联系,也与社会主义国家以及制度的存在有着直接关系。从理论实质的角度讲,新自由主义与旧自由主义在本质上既有相同的地方,但也存在着一定的差异与不同。对于新自由主义而言,自由市场与自由社会,既是其理论的出发点,也是其理论的立足点,这与旧自由主义以个人自由为立足点有着很大的不同。如果说旧自由主义基于个人自由来反抗封建专制与等级思想的话,那么新自由主义则主要是基于自由社会来攻击马克思主义、集体主义、社会主义及其制度。在新自由主义的理论逻辑与理论视野中,马克思主义、集体主义、社会主义及其制度往往被其视为是自由市场与“自由社会”的敌人。对于新自由主义的理论危害,社会主义国家与生活于社会主义国家的人民要有清醒的认识,不要被其“自由之美”的思想所迷惑,更不要在其理论的牵引下颠倒对世界的认知、迷失历史前进的方向与作出错误的历史选择。
In the history of liberalism,it has undergone a historical evolution from old liberalism to new liberalism.The emergence and existence of neoliberalism are closely related to the evolution of capitalism to the imperialist stage,as well as to the existence of socialist countries and systems.From a theoretical perspective,neoliberalism and old liberalism share similarities in essence,,but there are also certain differences and differences.For neoliberalism,the free market and free society are both the starting point and the foothold of its theory,which is very different from the old liberalism's focus on individual freedom.If the old liberalism was based on individual freedom to resist feudal autocracy and hierarchical thinking,then the new liberalism was mainly based on a free society to attack Marxism,collectivism,socialism,and their systems.In the theoretical logic and perspective of neoliberalism,Marxism,collectivism,socialism,and their systems are often seen as enemies of free markets and societies.Socialist countries and the people living in socialist countries should have a clear understanding of the theoretical harm of neoliberalism.They should not be confused by their“beauty of freedom”ideas,nor should they reverse their understanding of the world,lose the direction of historical progress,and make wrong historical choices under the guidance of their theories.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2024年第1期391-407,共17页
Contemporary Marxism Review
基金
2022年度湖北省高等学校哲学社会科学研究重大项目(湖北省社科基金前期资助项目)“社会主义文化强国建设中的文化心理研究”(22ZD005)之阶段性研究成果
华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目资助(CCNU23CS005)
关键词
新自由主义
理论立场
理论实质
理论危害
唯物主义历史观
Neoliberalism
Theoretical position
Theoretical essence
Theoretical hazard
Materialist conception of history