摘要
在政治哲学的研究领域内,对比20世纪70年代由罗尔斯掀起的正义理论研究热潮,马克思主义的国家理论研究则再未能形成过往的学术景象,似乎有所沉寂了。我们知道,在20世纪,以米利班德为代表的普通马克思主义(Plain Marxism)的工具主义和普兰查斯的新马克思主义的结构主义所展开的国家观念之争,曾引起不小的学术史效应。
Based on the empirical and historical studies of politics,Barrow attempts to reconstruct and synthesize various national theories of traditional Marxist genealogy from the perspective of critical methodology.Thisspectrum covers general Marxism,neo-Marxism and post-Marxism,but it is not a straight-forward narrative.In order to reconstruct an integrated national theory,instrumentalism,structural functionalism,derivatism,institutional realism,systematic analytics and other analysis are compared on the axis of national theory.Although Barrow’s state theory helps to deepen the perspective for research of Marxist state theory and clarify the related problems,this reconstruction still deviates from the methodology of historical materialism.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2019年第1期183-197,541-542,共17页
Contemporary Marxism Review
基金
国家社会科学基金“约翰·霍洛威的开放马克思主义文献翻译与研究”(编号:17BZX032)阶段性成果