期刊文献+

近视患者SMILE手术前后视觉相关生活质量分析

Analysis of vision related quality of life in myopic patients before and after smile surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的调查飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)对近视患者视觉相关生活质量的影响。方法回顾性分析2018年6月至2019年3月在我科行SMILE手术的近视患者98例(186眼),利用中文版美国国立眼科研究所视功能问卷(NEI-VFQ250)在术前和术后3个月对患者进行问卷调查并分析比较评分结果的差异。结果患者术前综合得分平均为(54.76±25.46),术后3个月评分为(72.72±23.38),二者比较差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.001)。术后评分中不同年龄、性别比较有差异性(P<0.05),项目中改善最明显的有总视力、远近视力相关活动、周边视力等17条,差异均有显著统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论NEI-VFQ250衡量患者生活质量的变化敏感有效,SMILE治疗近视可提升患者视觉相关生活质量。 Objective To investigate the impact of vision-related quality of life on patients with myopia after SMILE surgery.Methods The NEI-VFQ250 was applied to patients by questionnaire before operation and at 3 months after operation.The score results were analyzed and compared.Results The average score of the patients before operation was(54.76±25.46)and(72.72±23.38)at 3 months after operation.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.001).There were differences in the postoperative scores of different ages and genders,total vision,distance and peripheral vision,etc.,The differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion NEI-VFQ250 is sensitive and effective in measuring changes in patients’quality of life.SMILE could improve vision-related quality of life.
作者 税丹 毛科 邓韬 刘琼 Shi Dan;Mao Ke;Deng Tao;Liu Qiong(Department of Ophthalmology,Leshan people's Hospital,Leshan 614000,Sichuan)
出处 《结直肠肛门外科》 2021年第S01期27-28,共2页 Journal of Colorectal & Anal Surgery
关键词 近视患者 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE) 视觉相关生活质量 Myopia patients Small incision lamellar extraction(SMILE) Vision-related quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1Nichols J J, Mitchell GL, Saracino M, Zadnik K. Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2003,121 ( 9 ) : 1289-1296.
  • 2Toker E, Onal S, Eraslan M, Eyriparmak M. The Turkish version of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument:translation,validity and reliability[J].Qual Life Res, 2008,17(10) :1269-1276.
  • 3Ritchey ER, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The comparison of overnight lens modalities ( COLM ) study [ J ]. Eye Contact Lens, 2005,31 (2) :70-75.
  • 4Berntsen DA,Mitchell GL,Barr JT. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life[J].Optom Vis Sci,2006,83(6) :354-359.
  • 5Lipson MJ. Musch DC. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses:vision-related quality of life[J]. Optom Vis Sci,2007,84(7) :593- 597.
  • 6Hays RD, Mangione CM, Ellwein L, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, Mcdonnell PJ. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrmnent[J]. Ophthalmology, 2003,110 ( 12 ) : 2292-2301.
  • 7McDonnell PJ, Mangione C, Lee P, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, Berry S, et al. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error[ J ]. Ophthalmology ,2003,110 (12) :2302-2309.
  • 8Nichols J J, Twa MD, Mitchell GL. Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes[J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31 ( 12 ) : 2313-2318.
  • 9Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, McDonnell PJ. Development of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Correction Quality of Life questionnaire focus groups [J]. Ophthalmology, 2003,110(12) :2285-2291.
  • 10Hays RD, Woolley JM. The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research [ J ]. Pharmacoeconomics.2000,18(5 ) :419-423.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部