我国《反垄断法》中的拒绝交易分析框架之重构

Re-construction of the Analytical Framework of Refusal to Deal in China's Anti-monopoly Law

我国对于拒绝交易法律规定存在三个问题:(1)未明确不同行为表现方式的竞争损害;(2)未明确拒绝交易必需设施的表现形式;(3)未指出拒绝交易的救济措施。这些立法不足使得实践执法困难重重。基于国外成熟的执法实践,有必要将必需设施作为拒绝交易执法体系的基本原则,并佐以歧视性拒绝交易的特殊执法模式;同时,还需针对拒绝交易设立后续供应的承诺机制。

There are three problems contained in the provisions about refusal to deal under China's Anti-monopoly Law.First,it does not specify competition harm of all the conduct.Secondly,it does not ascertain the specific conduct of refusing to deal with essential facilities.Thirdly,it does not offer the remedies for refusal to deal.These gaps results into difficulties in the enforcement.Based on the matured practices at the international level,it is proposed to set the essential facility doctrine as the basic principle for refusal to deal,to establish a special regime for discriminatory refusal to deal,and to design proper commitment mechanisms for the subsequent transactions.