期刊文献+

基于SWMM模型的溢流口水文计算

Hydrological Calculation of Overflow Outlet Based on SWMM Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文基于SWMM模型,建立道路排水水文水动力模型,模拟分析了溢流口外排流量的时程变化,并计算出了不同设计降雨条件下的最大外排流量。同时,将模型预测值与传统水力学方法计算的最大外排流量进行比较,分析了差异以及导致差异的原因。结果显示:(1)根据传统水力学方法计算的最大外排流量大于模型模拟的最大外排流量,以侧分带溢流井最大外排流量为例,在不同设计年限下,前者平均为后者平均的1.62倍,用前者作为设计值,过于保守,增大了不必要的投资;(2)在重现期大于十年的设计降雨条件下,中分带会产生一定的地表径流,多数设计未考虑设置雨水系统,易导致超标雨水漫流进入车行道,具有一定安全隐患,应设置溢流设施,并根据中分带宽度、暴雨强度确定规模。 Based on the SWMM model,this paper established a hydrological and hydrodynamic model for road drainage to simulate and analyze the time-history change of the discharge flow from the overflow outlet,and calculated the maximum efflux flow under different design rainfall conditions.Meanwhile,this paper compared the maximum efflux flow predicted by the model with that calculated by the traditional hydraulic method,and analyzed the difference and the reasons for the difference.The results showed that(1)the maximum efflux flow calculated with the traditional hydraulic method is greater than that simulated by the model.Taking the maximum efflux flow rate of the overflow well in the side zoning as an example,under different design years,the average of the former is 1.62 times that of the latter.Using the former as the design value is too conservative and increases unnecessary investment;(2)under the designed rainfall conditions with a return period greater than ten years,a certain amount of surface runoff will be generated in the mid-zonal zone.Most designs do not consider setting up a rainwater system,which easily causes excessive rainwater to flow into the roadway,causinng safety hazards.So overflow facilities should be established,and the scale should be determined according to the width of the median belt and the intensity of rainstorms.
作者 杨进 龚华凤 郑骁奇 丁梦娇 Yang Jin;Gong Huafeng;Zheng Xiaoqi;Ding Mengjiao
出处 《重庆建筑》 2022年第S01期446-450,共5页 Chongqing Architecture
关键词 海绵城市 SWMM模型 溢流井 最大外排流量 sponge city SWMM model overflow well maximum efflux flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献57

  • 1任伯帜,邓仁健,李文健.SWMM模型原理及其在霞凝港区的应用[J].水运工程,2006(4):41-44. 被引量:47
  • 2丛翔宇,倪广恒,惠士博,田富强,张彤.基于SWMM的北京市典型城区暴雨洪水模拟分析[J].水利水电技术,2006,37(4):64-67. 被引量:119
  • 3Paul M J, J L Meyer. Streams in the urban iandscape[J]. Annual Revuen of Ecology and Systermatic, 2001,32:333- 365.
  • 4Center for Watershed Protection. Impacts of Impervious Cover on Aquatic Systems[Z]. Watershed Protection Research Monograph Number 1, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, Maryland, 2003.
  • 5Schuster S, Grismer M E. Evaluation of water quality projects in the Lake Tahoe basin[J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2004,90 (1-3):225-242.
  • 6Sriyaraj K, Shutes R B E. An assessment of the impact of motorway runoff on a pond, wetland and stream[J]. Environ Int, 2001,26(5-6), 433 -439.
  • 7Storm water management model user's manual Version 5.0[Z]. 2008.
  • 8United States Environmental Protection Agency. National Menu of Stormwater Best Management Practices[C]// Fact Sheet, Dry Detention Ponds,Washington, DC.
  • 9Atlanta Regional Commission. Georgia Stormwater Management Manual[C]// Section 3. 4.1 Dry Detention / Dry ED Basins, Au- gust 2001,8.
  • 10Dykehouse Terry P E Jones, Edmunds Gainseville F L. Retention Ponds and Detention Ponds, The Recovery Proeess[Z].

共引文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部