摘要
关于段玉裁校释《释名》底本问题,此前有学者进行过研究,提出段氏所据底本乃吴琯本,本文通过材料对比,对段玉裁所引"今本"《释名》、毕沅所引"今本"《释名》、吴琯本《释名》以及现存《释名》版本进行梳理和比勘,进而判断段玉裁所据《释名》底本或为明代毕效钦校刊本,为段玉裁校释《释名》底本研究提供一些参考意见。
About the question of annotated version of Shi Ming by Duan yucai suggested.After some scholars studied,put forward the idea that version of annotation comments Shi Ming by Duan was Wu Guan’s.In the paper,through the comparison of materials,Compare the current version of Shiming by Duan yucai and Bi yuan cited,Wu guan’s version of Shiming and existing version of Shiming to combing and proofreading.For further judge that Duan yucai’s version of Shiming may be the version of proofread by Bi xiaoqin in the Ming dynasty,for the study of nnotated version of Shi Ming by Duan yucai suggested to provide reference opinions.
作者
闫平凡
张晓琳
Yan Pingfan;Zhang Xiaolin
出处
《史志学刊》
2020年第1期73-79,共7页
Journal of History and Chorography
关键词
底本
《释名》
段玉裁
The original version
Shiming
Duan yucai