期刊文献+

BDS-2与BDS-3卫星空间信号精度评估 被引量:20

Accuracy assessment of BDS-2 and BDS-3 satellite signal-in-space
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对BDS-3现有卫星空间信号精度评估问题,该文以BDS-2和BDS-3卫星为研究对象,介绍了BDS卫星空间信号精度评估的方法,基于MGEX发布的2019-05-01—2019-05-31日连续31d的广播星历与WUM分析中心的精密星历产品对33颗BDS卫星的轨道误差、卫星钟差、用户测距误差(URE)和空间信号测距误差(SISRE)进行精度评估。研究结果表明:BDS-2中,IGSO与MEO的轨道精度优于GEO,径向精度优于切向和法向;星载钟差均值优于12.1ns;URE和SISRE均值分别优于1.0和1.2m;BDS-3MEO卫星轨道径向、切向、法向均值分别优于0.2、0.8、0.4m,径向和法向比BDS-2 MEO分别提高45.8%与21.1%;BDS-3卫星星载钟差均值优于7.7ns,比BDS-2提高36.2%;BDS-3的URE和SISRE均值分别优于0.6和0.5m,比BDS-2分别提高42.9%和47.4%。 Aiming at the problem on the accuracy assessment of signal-in-space for BDS-3 existing satellites,this paper focused on BDS-2 and BDS-3 satellites,and introduced the method of accuracy assessment for BDS satellite signal-in-space.The accuracy of satellite orbit error,clock error,user range error(URE)and signal-in-space range error(SISRE)for 33 BDS satellites were evaluated based on successive 31 days broadcast ephemeris data of multi-GNSS experiment(MGEX)and precise ephemeris products of Wuhan university multi-GNSS(WUM)during 2019-05-01—2019-05-31.The results showed that:in BDS-2,the orbital accuracy of inclined geosynchronous orbit(IGSO)and medium earth orbit(MEO)was better than that of geostationary earth orbit(GEO),the accuracy of radial orbit error was better than that of tangential and normal;the mean on-orbit satellite clock error was better than 12.1 ns;the mean URE and SISRE were better than 1.0 and 1.2 m,respectively.The mean of radial,tangential and normal orbit error of the BDS-3 MEO were respectively better than 0.2,0.8 and 0.4 m,and the accuracy of radial and normal were increased by 45.8%and 21.1%compared with the BDS-2 MEO.The mean on-orbit satllite clock error of the BDS-3 was better than 7.7 ns,which was improved by 36.2%compared with the BDS-2.The mean URE and SISRE of the BDS-3 were better than 0.6 and 0.5 m,respectively,which were improved by 42.9%and 47.4%compared with the BDS-2.
作者 刘凡 李雷 刘国林 王胜利 徐莹 LIU Fan;LI Lei;LIU Guolin;WANG Shengli;XU Ying(College of Geomatics,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao,Shandong 266590,China;College of Ocean Science and Engineering,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao,Shandong 266590,China)
出处 《测绘科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期54-61,76,共9页 Science of Surveying and Mapping
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41704021) 青岛市应用基础研究计划项目(18-8-8-42-jch) 山东省重点研发计划项目(2018GGX109008).
关键词 BDS-2 BDS-3 用户测距误差 空间信号测距误差 精度评估 BDS-2 BDS-3 URE SISRE accuracy assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献100

  • 1Organizing Committee of Parallel Computing and Evolutionary Computation.Preface[J].Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences,2003,8(S1):5-5. 被引量:7
  • 2魏子卿.关于2000中国大地坐标系的建议[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2006,26(2):1-4. 被引量:58
  • 3陈俊勇,杨元喜,王敏,张燕平,唐颖哲,李辉,程鹏飞,孙凤华,张鹏,郭春喜.2000国家大地控制网的构建和它的技术进步[J].测绘学报,2007,36(1):1-8. 被引量:138
  • 4Dennis D. McCarthy and Gerara Petit (eds.). IERS Conventions(2003) [ R]. IERS Technical Note No. 32, Verlag des Bundesamts ftir Kartographie und Geodasie Frankfurt am Main 2004.
  • 5Moritz H. Geodetic reference system 1980[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2000,74 : 128 - 133.
  • 6Hofmann-Wellenhof B and Moritz H. Physical geodesy[ M]. second edition, SpringerWienNewYork, 2006.
  • 7National Imagery and Mapping Agency. Department of defense world geodetic system 1984: Its definition and relationships with local geodetic systems [ R ]. National Imagery and Mapping Agency technical report 8350.2 Third Edition.
  • 8Addendum to NIMA TR 8350. 2: Implementation of the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) Reference Frame Gl150[ EB/OL]. http://earth -info. nga. milfGandG/ publieations/tr8350.2/Addendum% 20NIMA% 20TR8350. 2. pdf/
  • 9Briggs I C. Machine coutouring using minimum curvature [J]. Geophysics, 1974, 39(1) :39 -48.
  • 10Warren D, Raquet J. Broadcast vs. Precise GPS Ephemerides: a Historical Perspective[J]. GPS Solutions,2003(7) :151-156

共引文献716

同被引文献167

引证文献20

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部