高校教师科研评价改革路径对比分析与思考——以英国和美国为例

Comparative Analysis and Reflection on the Reform Path of Teachers’ Scientific Research Evaluation in Universities:Taking the United Kingdom and the United States for Example

科研水平和评价方式是高校评价教师职称的能动性杠杆,学术研究、科研水平、成果形式、社会影响、公共服务等指标是教师职称评聘的重要依据,“唯论文、唯帽子、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”的“五唯”现象成为科研评价的突出问题。通过对英美两国在评价政策、评价内涵、评价结构、评价客体和评价标准等方面的对比分析,找到二者评价体系的特点与可取之处,为现存问题寻找解决的突破口。

The level of scientific research and the way of assessment are the dynamic levers for evaluating teachers’professional titles in colleges and universities.Academic research,scientific research level,form of academic achievements,social influence,public service and other indicators are important basis of professional title appraisal and employment.The phenomenon of Five-only(五唯,paying too much attention to papers,hats,titles,academic qualifications and award)becomes the outstanding problem of scientific research evaluation.By comparing and analyzing the evaluation policy,connotation,structure,object and standard in the UK and the United States,this paper tries to find the characteristics and advantages of the two evaluation systems,so as to find a breakthrough to solve the existing problems in Chinese colleges and universities.