仲裁协议效力扩张视角下代位仲裁研究

学界和实务界均对代位权诉讼中以仲裁协议抗辩存在分歧,各地法院在司法实践中均呈现出不同的做法。允许代位诉讼,次债务人提起仲裁管辖抗辩,可以申请仲裁,代位诉讼中止审理。这似乎为有仲裁协议的代位诉讼提供了折中方案,但恶意达成仲裁协议、损害债权权益与纠纷解决效率缓慢的局面依然威胁着代位权的行使和仲裁程序的稳定性。在仲裁协议相对性的原则下,考虑到债权人的权益保护、次债务人的仲裁合意和程序选择利益,分析代位权通过仲裁方式行使的可行性,在仲裁协议主观范围效力扩张的基础上,采纳运用仲裁合意的拟制,探寻制度构建的完善。在统一法律适用、多元化纠纷解决与仲裁事业的发展下,有效利用司法资源,维护当事人合法权益。

There are differences between academic and practical circles on the defense of arbitration agreement in subrogation litigation,and there are different practices in the judicial practice of courts in various places.Subrogation litigation is permitted,and the subdebtor may apply for arbitration if it raises the defense of arbitration jurisdiction,and the subrogation action is suspended.This seems to provide a compromise solution for subrogation litigation with arbitration agreements,but the bad faith conclusion of arbitration agreements,the depression of claims and the slow efficiency still threaten the exercise of subrogation rights and the stability of arbitration proceedings.Under the principle of relativity of the arbitration agreement,taking into account the protection of the rights and interests of creditors,the arbitration agreement of the sub-debtor and the interests of procedural choice,the feasibility of subrogation arbitration in subrogation is analyzed,and on the basis of the expansion of the subjective scope and effect of the arbitration agreement,the fiction of arbitration agreement is adopted to explore the improvement of system construction.Under the development of unified application of law and diversified dispute resolution and arbitration,effectively use judicial resources to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.