摘要
本文选取72项公开可知的在撤销委员会作出的有关ICSID裁决的中止执行的决定,并对撤销委员会对中止执行制度及其认为影响裁决被中止执行的观点进行了分析。此外,本文通过时间线分析总结了中止执行的历史演变,认为中止执行的法律框架已经发生变化并且得到时间验证。而在该框架下,新的要求中止执行的理由不断增多,给实践带来了一定的挑战。最后,本文还考察了国内实践,发现撤销委员会与国内法院在ICSID裁决的中止执行问题上所考虑的情形存在细微差别。
This article selects 72 decisions to stay of enforcement made in the annulment proceeding of treaty-based ICSID awards that are available to the public.The analysis of these decisions is based on the committee’s comprehension of the stay of enforcement and considerations on influential and relevant circumstances to the stay.In addition,this article endeavours to summarise the historical evolution of the stay of enforcement based on the timeline analysis,and concluded empirically that the legal framework of the stay has changed and is now being evaluated in practice.Meanwhile,new grounds for requesting a stay of enforcement keep rising,which presents practical difficulties.Furthermore,this article glances at the domestic practice and finds the subtle difference between the ICSID committee and the domestic court regarding the circumstance that drives the stay.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2023年第3期42-64,共23页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly